Andrena sola

Viereck, 1917 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Andrenidae/Andrena

At a glance

Occurrence records334

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens13

eDNA detections17

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Andrena sola's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility334 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI17 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics13 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF334 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries17 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD13 specimens

01Narrative

The lonely miner bee (Andrena sola) is a species of miner bee in the family Andrenidae. It is found in Central America and North America.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding13 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena sola has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens13

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections17

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P651 bp consensus7 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 86% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)6.4%

Haplotypes2

BINs3

Most divergent pair9.4%

Where individuals differ — all 90 variable positions, in barcode order

9Tmostly conserved

12Cmostly conserved

15Tmostly conserved

16Gmostly conserved

17Cmostly conserved

18Tvariable

27Amostly conserved

36Amostly conserved

39Avariable

54Tvariable

57Tmostly conserved

63Avariable

70Cvariable

78Tvariable

96Tvariable

111Tmostly conserved

117Avariable

120Tvariable

123Avariable

126Tvariable

129Gvariable

150Tmostly conserved

162Avariable

168Cmostly conserved

228Tvariable

243Cvariable

246Cmostly conserved

259Tvariable

262Cmostly conserved

277Avariable

279Tvariable

289Tmostly conserved

300Tvariable

301Avariable

303Amostly conserved

306Tvariable

315Cvariable

318Avariable

339Cvariable

345Tvariable

360Tvariable

375Cvariable

378Cmostly conserved

381Tvariable

382Cvariable

393Tmostly conserved

399Tmostly conserved

408Cvariable

423Cvariable

429Tvariable

432Tvariable

435Cvariable

441Tvariable

447Amostly conserved

454Cmostly conserved

456Tvariable

459Tmostly conserved

480Tmostly conserved

495Amostly conserved

501Cvariable

513Avariable

516Cmostly conserved

522Tvariable

528Tvariable

531Amostly conserved

534Amostly conserved

535Tvariable

540Tmostly conserved

543Avariable

544Cmostly conserved

549Avariable

552Tvariable

561Avariable

567Cmostly conserved

573Avariable

576Tmostly conserved

577Cmostly conserved

582Tvariable

591Cvariable

592Tvariable

597Cvariable

606Tmostly conserved

612Cvariable

615Tvariable

624Tvariable

630Tvariable

633Amostly conserved

636Cvariable

642Cvariable

645Amostly conserved

TTATATTTTATCTTTGCTATATGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAGCATCTCTAAGATTTATTATTCGAATAGAACTAAGAAATCCAGGAAATTGA …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Andrena prunisame genus9.2%Andrena transnigrasame genus10.0%Andrena moriosame genus10.0%Andrena barbarasame genus10.0%Andrena vagasame genus10.4%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type334 records

Wild obs. + sensor36

Museum / vouchered298

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO480 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy93% within 1 km

≤100 m 26≤1 km 2>10 km 2

30 georeferenced · 6 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor36

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy27% within 1 km

≤100 m 4≤1 km 5≤10 km 23>10 km 1

33 georeferenced · 265 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence298

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions11 of 14 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Beltsville, US	181
University of California, Davislocation not on record	27
US	22
Champaign, US	21
	16
Wuzhou, CN	8
WIlocation not on record	5
La Jolla, US	3
Vancouver, CA	3
US	2
Cambridge, US	2
San Diego, US	2
Mississippi State, US	2
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	1

14 institutions · 295 of 298 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA17 detections

Where the DNA of Andrena sola was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found17

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 17 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

Rocky outcrops

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median10.6 °C 4.10–15.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.2 °C

Max temp (day)17.1 °C 9.50–22.0

Min temp (night)4.80 °C -1.60–10.6

Precipitation28.8 mm/mo 14.2–92.7

Air humidity54.5 % 45.8–60.9

Moisture balance-82.1 mm/mo -139–15.8

Vapour deficit672 Pa 420–815

Wind speed3.10 m/s 2.00–4.10

Cloud cover35.3 % 27.2–45.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 16 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)