Argyresthia conjugella
Zeller, 1839 · speciesAt a glance
Sources7 archives
Databases and archives Argyresthia conjugella's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation6 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility12 196 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI198 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics217 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Argyresthia conjugella, the apple fruit moth, is a moth of the family Yponomeutidae. It is found in North America, Europe,Fauna Europaea Siberia, Central Asia and Japan. The wingspan is 10–14 mm. The head is yellowish-white. Forewings are rather dark purplish - fuscous ;costa strigulated with whitish ; a thick white dorsal streak to tornus ; an interrupted dark fuscous median fascia ; one or two white costal spots before apex. Hindwings are grey.The larva is dull whitish yellow ; head and plate of 2 pale brown.Meyrick, E., 1895 A Handbook of British Lepidoptera MacMillan, London pdf Keys and description Adults are on wing from May to July depending on the location. The larvae feed on Sorbus aucuparia and Malus species. The Argyresyhia conjugella, or the apple fruit moth, is seen to be a parasite for the apple growing communities in Finland, Norway, and Sweden. These moths are seed predators for the mountain-ash trees rowan (Elameen et al.). However, when there is a dip in the fruit produced by rowan every couple years in this region, the apple fruit moth finds a new host in the form of apples. Apples are not their desired host however and they communicate with the rowan seeds they prefer through odors (Knudsen et al.).
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Diet & foraging2
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Argyresthia conjugella has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
Record type12 196 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions13 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| NHMOlocation not on record | 236 |
| DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record | 150 |
| Oulu, FI | 96 |
| Tartu, EE | 86 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 80 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 63 |
| Zoological Museum of the University of Chittagong, Bangladeshlocation not on record | 51 |
| Stockholm, SE | 46 |
| Salzburg, AT | 35 |
| University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record | 35 |
| Nijmegen, NL | 24 |
| Kuopio, FI | 24 |
| University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record | 22 |
| Tilburg, NL | 19 |
| Instytut Systematyki i Ewolucji Zwierząt Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 19 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 18 |
| Tallinn, EE | 16 |
| National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record | 15 |
| neflocation not on record | 13 |
| European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record | 11 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 10 |
| DABUHlocation not on record | 10 |
| Philadelphia, US | 9 |
| Washington, US | 8 |
| RMZlocation not on record | 7 |
| Metsähallituslocation not on record | 7 |
| NTNU-VMlocation not on record | 4 |
| South Kensington, GB | 3 |
| ZSMlocation not on record | 3 |
| Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record | 2 |
| Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record | 2 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 2 |
| Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record | 1 |
| Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 1 |
| Iwate Prefectural Museumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Canadian National Collection of Insects, Arachnids and Nematodeslocation not on record | 1 |
| NTNU University Museum, Department of Natural Historylocation not on record | 1 |
| Research Collection of Jeremy deWaardlocation not on record | 1 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 1 |
| Research Collection of Walter Ruckdeschellocation not on record | 1 |
| University of Kaiserslauternlocation not on record | 1 |
| Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeumlocation not on record | 1 |
| Trondheim, NO | 1 |
| KIRMlocation not on record | 1 |
| ZMAAlocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Argyresthia conjugella was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.