Anoscopus histrionicus

(Fabricius, 1794) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hemiptera/Cicadellidae/Anoscopus

At a glance

Occurrence records147

Data sources4

Biological traits2

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections1

Sources4 archives

Databases and archives Anoscopus histrionicus's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility147 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI1 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF147 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries1 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

02Traits & measurements

SourcesPantheon

Diet & foraging2

Feeding guild (adult)herbivore

Feeding guild (larval)herbivore

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoscopus histrionicus has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections1

Countries3

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus6 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 91% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)4.5%

Haplotypes1

BINs2

Where individuals differ — all 59 variable positions, in barcode order

67Tmostly conserved

91Cvariable

97Avariable

106Tvariable

109Gvariable

112Cvariable

115Tvariable

124Tmostly conserved

127Tvariable

142Cvariable

148Gvariable

166Avariable

172Tvariable

175Gvariable

181Tvariable

206Cvariable

212Tvariable

214Avariable

217Tvariable

220Cvariable

223Avariable

247Tvariable

255Gmostly conserved

259Cvariable

263Cvariable

271Avariable

274Cvariable

277Avariable

304Cvariable

313Gvariable

319Cvariable

322Gvariable

340Tvariable

346Tvariable

370Avariable

373Gvariable

385Tvariable

400Avariable

406Tvariable

407Tvariable

433Tvariable

451Tvariable

469Avariable

523Avariable

538Avariable

550Gvariable

553Tvariable

565Tmostly conserved

571Cmostly conserved

580Amostly conserved

598Amostly conserved

607Tmostly conserved

616Tmostly conserved

619Amostly conserved

622Gmostly conserved

625Tmostly conserved

631Tmostly conserved

634Cmostly conserved

646Cmostly conserved

AACTTTATATTTCATTTTTGGTTTATGATCTGGTATATTAGGTATAATACTTAGATTAATTATTCGTATTGAACTATCTCAACCAGGTTC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Anoscopus albigersame genus9.2%Anoscopus assimilissame genus9.9%Anoscopus flavostriatussame genus10.3%Anoscopus serratulaesame genus10.5%Anoscopus limicolasame genus10.7%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type147 records

Wild obs. + sensor123

Museum / vouchered8

Fossil12

Other4

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO360 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km

≤100 m 28≤1 km 18≤10 km 56>10 km 1

103 georeferenced · 20 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor123

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 1

2 georeferenced · 6 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence8

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 5 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
South Kensington, GB	3
Sofia University, St. Kliment Ohridskilocation not on record	1
DFlocation not on record	1
Tartu, EE	1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record	1

5 institutions · 7 of 8 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA1 detections

Where the DNA of Anoscopus histrionicus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found1

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 1 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

mountain meadow

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.7 °C 19.7–19.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.0 °C

Max temp (day)23.5 °C

Min temp (night)13.8 °C

Precipitation29.8 mm/mo

Air humidity56.1 %

Moisture balance-121 mm/mo

Vapour deficit1,003 Pa

Wind speed2.30 m/s

Cloud cover30.8 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)