Annaphila ida

Rindge & Smith, 1952 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae/Annaphila

At a glance

Occurrence records10

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens4

eDNA detections3

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Annaphila ida's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility10 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics4 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF10 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD4 specimens

01Narrative

Annaphila ida is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae (the owlet moths). It is found in North America. The MONA or Hodges number for Annaphila ida is 9861.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding4 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Annaphila ida has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens4

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus3 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)0.20%

Haplotypes1

BIN1

Where individuals differ — all 2 variable positions, in barcode order

278Tvariable

528Cvariable

AACATTATATTTTATTTTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAACTTCATTAAGATTACTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGTACCCCTGGATC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Annaphila depictasame genus4.7%Annaphila divasame genus5.0%Annaphila scurlockorumsame genus5.2%Annaphila superbasame genus5.3%Annaphila astrologasame genus5.5%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type10 records

Wild obs. + sensor1

Museum / vouchered9

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO16 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 1

1 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor1

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 9

9 georeferenced

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence9

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 1 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
New Haven, US	9

1 institutions · 9 of 9 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Annaphila ida was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median20.0 °C 15.5–24.5

Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.0 °C

Max temp (day)25.9 °C 21.6–30.1

Min temp (night)14.9 °C 9.80–19.9

Precipitation77.0 mm/mo 45.4–109

Air humidity56.6 % 56.3–56.9

Moisture balance-80.0 mm/mo -96.2–-63.8

Vapour deficit1,070 Pa 788–1,353

Wind speed3.40 m/s 2.00–4.80

Cloud cover32.6 % 26.4–38.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)