Annaphila depicta

Grote, 1873 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae/Annaphila

At a glance

Occurrence records102

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens12

eDNA detections10

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Annaphila depicta's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility102 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI10 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics12 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF102 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries10 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD12 specimens

01Narrative

Annaphila depicta, also called the rusty-barred annaphila, is a species of moth in the family Noctuidae (the owlet moths). It is found in North America. The wingspan is 21-24 mm. Its forewing is gray with a reddish-brown band. The hindwing is orange with black markings. It looks similar to Annaphila decia, but A. decia has more black markings on its hindwings than A. depicta. A. depicta's larvae are green and feed on Nemophila menziesii. The MONA or Hodges number for Annaphila depicta is 9866.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding12 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Annaphila depicta has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens12

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections10

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus7 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 99% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 4 variable positions, in barcode order

163Amostly conserved

200Gmostly conserved

364Cmostly conserved

604Avariable

AACTTTATATTTTATTTTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAACTTCATTAAGATTACTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGAACCCCTGGATC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)0.22%

Haplotypes4

BIN1

Most divergent pair0.30%

N.America

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Annaphila idasame genus4.7%Annaphila scurlockorumsame genus4.7%Annaphila divasame genus4.9%Annaphila superbasame genus5.0%Annaphila castasame genus5.5%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type102 records

Wild obs. + sensor44

Museum / vouchered58

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO172 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km

≤100 m 8≤1 km 7≤10 km 1>10 km 2

18 georeferenced · 26 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor44

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy11% within 1 km

≤100 m 3≤1 km 1≤10 km 32

36 georeferenced · 22 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence58

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions5 of 7 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
New Haven, US	33
Washington, US	16
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	4
Denver, US	2
San Francisco, US	1
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record	1
Chicago, US	1

7 institutions · 58 of 58 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA10 detections

Where the DNA of Annaphila depicta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found10

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 10 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median10.9 °C 9.20–21.4

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.9 °C

Max temp (day)16.4 °C 14.4–26.8

Min temp (night)5.20 °C 4.10–16.5

Precipitation142 mm/mo 74.7–227

Air humidity57.4 % 56.6–59.1

Moisture balance27.8 mm/mo -75.7–135

Vapour deficit564 Pa 478–1,174

Wind speed3.40 m/s 2.20–4.80

Cloud cover45.4 % 30.3–50.5

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 4 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)