Andrena lapponica is a Palearctic species of mining bee.BWARSEdward Saunders 1896, The Hymenoptera Aculeata of the British Isles London. pdf us.archive Full text with illustrations]
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena lapponica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens59
BINs3
Marker genes1
eDNA detections279
Countries12
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus45 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 93% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 45 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.7%
Haplotypes7
BINs2
Most divergent pair6.7%
N.AmericaEurope
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 109 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 830
Museum / vouchered4 265
Other14
Origin
Native435
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO12 408 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy76% within 1 km
≤100 m 2 130≤1 km 713≤10 km 905>10 km 7
3 755 georeferenced · 75 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 830
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy56% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 160≤1 km 974≤10 km 1 666>10 km 18
3 818 georeferenced · 447 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence4 265
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 57 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
1 592
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
465
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
243
ULglocation not on record
127
Philadelphia, US
115
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
114
Metsähallituslocation not on record
110
Zürich, CH
104
Trondheim, NO
82
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
78
KZMlocation not on record
69
NHMOlocation not on record
66
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
55
Bern, CH
49
ZMAAlocation not on record
48
Rovaniemi, FI
46
Tromsø, NO
33
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
32
Paro, BT
30
BioFokuslocation not on record
28
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
27
South Kensington, GB
23
Dhaka, BD
21
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
17
ZSMlocation not on record
15
neflocation not on record
13
Bonn, DE
13
NMOKlocation not on record
13
Wuzhou, CN
12
PRUNlocation not on record
12
CBDClocation not on record
12
PRAZlocation not on record
9
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
8
Kuopio, FI
7
MZLUlocation not on record
7
Stockholm, SE
7
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
5
Tartu, EE
5
5
Fribourg, CH
5
NCMGlocation not on record
5
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
Florida State Collection of Arthropods, The Museum of Entomologylocation not on record
4
Geneva, CH
3
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
3
Tallinn, EE
2
Winterthur, CH
2
Ghent, BE
2
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
2
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
1
Ugentlocation not on record
1
Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record
1
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
1
Mons, BE
1
Gothenburg, SE
1
MNHWlocation not on record
1
Haus der Natur, Salzburglocation not on record
1
57 institutions · 3 757 of 4 265 vouchered records shown · 508 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA279 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena lapponica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found279
Studies independent surveys3
Countries10
Verifiable raw sequence linked223
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 279 detections have coordinates
Open the map10 countries0
Hay meadowdry forb herbaceous4. Native Grassland|4.1. Tundraroadside forest marginshrub aspen
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.0 °C 8.40–13.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter24.1 °C
Max temp (day)16.5 °C 11.6–17.6
Min temp (night)8.00 °C 4.40–9.20
Precipitation66.4 mm/mo 48.2–103
Air humidity56.0 % 55.3–60.9
Moisture balance-42.0 mm/mo -48.9–6.30
Vapour deficit664 Pa 445–676
Wind speed2.60 m/s 1.90–4.10
Cloud cover49.1 % 44.9–58.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 276 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.