Acrobasis tricolorella

Grote, 1878 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Pyralidae/Acrobasis

At a glance

Occurrence records799

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens60

eDNA detections17

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Acrobasis tricolorella's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility799 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI17 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics60 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF799 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries17 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD60 specimens

01Narrative

Acrobasis tricolorella is een vlinder uit de familie van de snuitmotten (Pyralidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1878 door Grote.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding60 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acrobasis tricolorella has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens60

BINs5

Marker genes1

eDNA detections17

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus58 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 70 variable positions, in barcode order

5Cvariable

16Tvariable

25Tvariable

34Amostly conserved

43Tvariable

46Avariable

56Cvariable

58Tvariable

59Tvariable

85Avariable

100Amostly conserved

124Tmostly conserved

127Avariable

160Amostly conserved

200Gmostly conserved

205Tmostly conserved

211Avariable

217Avariable

220Tvariable

229Amostly conserved

235Cvariable

238Tvariable

263Cmostly conserved

265Avariable

266Cvariable

268Tvariable

271Cvariable

274Tvariable

280Tvariable

287Cvariable

302Avariable

334Tvariable

337Gvariable

358Tvariable

361Cmostly conserved

364Cvariable

368Avariable

376Tvariable

379Avariable

400Avariable

409Amostly conserved

412Ghighly variable

421Cvariable

451Cvariable

478Avariable

479Cvariable

490Tmostly conserved

500Cvariable

502Tvariable

508Tmostly conserved

517Avariable

518Gmostly conserved

529Cvariable

536Tvariable

553Tvariable

562Avariable

565Avariable

568Tvariable

571Tmostly conserved

574Avariable

581Tvariable

610Tvariable

616Tmostly conserved

622Tvariable

628Gvariable

634Cvariable

637Tvariable

643Tmostly conserved

646Tmostly conserved

658Cvariable

AACTCTATATTTTATTTTTGGAATTTGATCAGGAATAGTAGGTACATCATTAAGACTTTTAATTCGAGCTGAATTAGGTACTCCAGGATC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)4.6%

Haplotypes16

BINs5

Most divergent pair9.4%

N.America

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Acrobasis obtusellasame genus6.7%Acrobasis obliquasame genus7.0%Acrobasis legateasame genus7.1%Acrobasis mniaropissame genus7.3%Acrobasis consociellasame genus7.4%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type799 records

Wild obs. + sensor357

Museum / vouchered442

Origin

Native2

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO1 260 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km

≤100 m 205≤1 km 23≤10 km 26>10 km 19

273 georeferenced · 84 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor357

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy51% within 1 km

≤100 m 26≤1 km 13≤10 km 30>10 km 7

76 georeferenced · 366 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence442

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions10 of 20 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Santa Barbara Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	114
Oregon State Arthropod Collectionlocation not on record	92
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record	70
Vernal, US	57
New Haven, US	21
East Lansing, US	19
San Francisco, US	17
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	11
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record	4
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record	4
Mississippi State, US	3
Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record	3
Edmonton, CA	2
Los Angeles, US	2
SOVTlocation not on record	2
Denver, US	1
St. Paul, US	1
Santa Cruz, US	1
Georgia Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	1
ASUlocation not on record	1

20 institutions · 426 of 442 vouchered records shown · 16 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA17 detections

Where the DNA of Acrobasis tricolorella was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found17

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 17 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

Grassland

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median15.9 °C 13.5–20.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter24.4 °C

Max temp (day)20.8 °C 18.7–26.9

Min temp (night)11.9 °C 7.20–14.5

Precipitation61.0 mm/mo 30.6–103

Air humidity56.1 % 51.6–59.9

Moisture balance-77.8 mm/mo -101–-15.7

Vapour deficit747 Pa 659–1,170

Wind speed2.40 m/s 1.70–2.80

Cloud cover40.2 % 33.6–43.1

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 16 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)