Acleris variegana, la Tordeuse chagrinée ou Petite Tordeuse des arbres fruitiers, est une espèce de Lépidoptères de la famille des Tortricidae et du genre Acleris, d'origine paléarctique et largement répandue en Europe. Sa chenille consomme les feuilles en particulier des Rosaceae, notamment les Prunus et les Rosiers.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acleris variegana has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens136
BINs5
Marker genes1
eDNA detections134
Countries17
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus130 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 95% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 34 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.6%
Haplotypes24
BINs5
Most divergent pair7.1%
EuropeN.America
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type30 646 records
Wild obs. + sensor28 813
Museum / vouchered1 676
Other157
Origin
Native119
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO22 844 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy49% within 1 km
≤100 m 9 936≤1 km 2 847≤10 km 13 320>10 km 132
26 235 georeferenced · 2 578 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor28 813
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 934≤1 km 282≤10 km 252>10 km 3
1 471 georeferenced · 205 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 676
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions15 of 44 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record
827
NHMOlocation not on record
151
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
89
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
68
Tartu, EE
47
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
37
Nijmegen, NL
33
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
32
CBDClocation not on record
29
Zoological Museum of the University of Chittagong, Bangladeshlocation not on record
28
Philadelphia, US
24
DABUHlocation not on record
16
Salzburg, AT
15
Stockholm, SE
15
ZAF-UMUlocation not on record
14
Zürich, CH
12
New Haven, US
10
Radicondoli, IT
10
Tallinn, EE
8
Durban Natural Science Museumlocation not on record
8
RMZlocation not on record
7
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
7
Cleveland Museum of Natural History, OH (CLEV)location not on record
4
MZLUlocation not on record
4
BioFokuslocation not on record
4
Rovaniemi, FI
3
St. Paul, US
3
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
3
neflocation not on record
3
Essig Museum of Entomologylocation not on record
3
San Diego, US
2
University of Kaiserslauternlocation not on record
2
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
2
ZSMlocation not on record
2
Tromsø, NO
2
Kuopio, FI
2
San Francisco, US
1
Metsähallituslocation not on record
1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
1
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
1
Washington State Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
1
Research Collection of Hartmut Wegnerlocation not on record
1
University of Vienna, Dept of Botany and Biodiversity Researchlocation not on record
1
Research Collection of Alfred Haslbergerlocation not on record
1
44 institutions · 1 534 of 1 676 vouchered records shown · 142 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA134 detections
Where the DNA of Acleris variegana was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found134
Studies independent surveys2
Countries17
Verifiable raw sequence linked6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.8 °C 8.70–18.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter16.8 °C
Max temp (day)19.9 °C 12.8–23.4
Min temp (night)11.2 °C 4.30–14.6
Precipitation74.5 mm/mo 35.6–130
Air humidity60.5 % 56.6–64.5
Moisture balance-13.8 mm/mo -102–91.4
Vapour deficit713 Pa 422–903
Wind speed2.80 m/s 1.50–5.30
Cloud cover39.3 % 32.0–48.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 126 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility30 646 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI134 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics136 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗