Anthocoris amplicollis

Horváth, 1893 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hemiptera/Anthocoridae/Anthocoris

At a glance

Occurrence records143

Data sources6

Biological traits2

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections8

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Anthocoris amplicollis's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility143 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI8 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page5 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Traits & measurements1 literature sources2 traits

Occurrence & distributionGBIF143 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 2 countries8 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

01Narrative

Anthocoris amplicollis is een wants uit de familie van de bloemwantsen (Anthocoridae). De soort werd het eerst wetenschappelijk beschreven door Géza Horváth in 1893.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

SourcesPantheon

Diet & foraging2

Feeding guild (adult)predator

Feeding guild (larval)predator

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anthocoris amplicollis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections8

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus3 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 88% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)8.1%

Haplotypes2

BINs2

Most divergent pair11.4%

Where individuals differ — all 77 variable positions, in barcode order

7Avariable

19Cvariable

46Avariable

61Cvariable

70Cvariable

74Cvariable

85Avariable

100Avariable

112Cvariable

118Tvariable

133Tvariable

139Avariable

160Avariable

163Tvariable

169Tvariable

172Tvariable

184Avariable

187Cvariable

193Cvariable

197Cvariable

205Avariable

217Gvariable

220Avariable

223Avariable

250Tvariable

259Cvariable

266Tvariable

268Avariable

274Cvariable

277Tvariable

280Cvariable

284Cvariable

298Avariable

301Tvariable

307Tvariable

334Avariable

346Cvariable

352Tvariable

355Avariable

358Cvariable

364Gvariable

386Cvariable

401Cvariable

403Tvariable

406Cvariable

407Tvariable

415Gvariable

421Gvariable

427Tvariable

428Tvariable

439Cvariable

445Cvariable

454Tvariable

469Avariable

508Avariable

514Tvariable

520Tvariable

523Tvariable

529Tvariable

530Cvariable

533Cvariable

542Cvariable

548Cvariable

557Tvariable

562Tvariable

568Tvariable

578Cvariable

580Tvariable

581Tvariable

595Cvariable

601Tvariable

610Tvariable

619Avariable

622Avariable

625Gvariable

628Avariable

646Cvariable

AACTTTATATTTTATATTCGGAATATGAGCAGGAATATTAGGAACATCATTAAGATGAATCATTCGAATCGAACTAGGACAACCAGGATC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Anthocoris nemoralissame genus1.5%Anthocoris butlerisame genus4.9%Anthocoris confusussame genus10.5%Anthocoris gallarumulmisame genus11.2%Anthocoris minkisame genus12.1%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type143 records

Wild obs. + sensor74

Museum / vouchered56

Other13

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO396 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy51% within 1 km

≤100 m 21≤1 km 10≤10 km 30

61 georeferenced · 13 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor74

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km

≤100 m 31≤1 km 2≤10 km 1

34 georeferenced · 22 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence56

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions1 of 7 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Researchlocation not on record	11
ZSMlocation not on record	4
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record	2
UO-CeStuBiolocation not on record	1
Bonn, DE	1
MZLUlocation not on record	1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	1

7 institutions · 21 of 56 vouchered records shown · 35 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA8 detections

Where the DNA of Anthocoris amplicollis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found8

Studies independent surveys2

Countries2

Verifiable raw sequence linked1

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 8 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median10.0 °C 0.1–18.3

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.0 °C

Max temp (day)14.8 °C 3.20–22.8

Min temp (night)4.90 °C -2.90–13.5

Precipitation55.6 mm/mo 50.7–105

Air humidity59.0 % 57.5–64.7

Moisture balance-9.40 mm/mo -42.3–29.4

Vapour deficit524 Pa 222–896

Wind speed3.30 m/s 2.50–3.50

Cloud cover40.0 % 31.3–55.6

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 8 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)