Farbvariante: mittlerer und hinterer Fleck verbunden Der Gefleckte Halsbock, auch Sechstropfiger Halsbock (Anoplodera sexguttata, Syn.: Leptura sexguttata) ist ein europäischer Bockkäfer.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoplodera sexguttata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens35
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections34
Countries8
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus34 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 14 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.40%
Haplotypes13
BIN1
Most divergent pair1.8%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type7 937 records
Wild obs. + sensor6 600
Museum / vouchered1 080
Cultivated / captive1
Other256
Origin
Native828
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO13 404 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy45% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 528≤1 km 908≤10 km 2 843>10 km 174
5 453 georeferenced · 1 147 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 600
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy24% within 1 km
≤100 m 77≤1 km 171≤10 km 755>10 km 12
1 015 georeferenced · 65 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 080
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions14 of 40 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
142
Brussels, BE
79
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
63
Geneva, CH
59
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
41
Paro, BT
41
NHMOlocation not on record
27
Helsinki, FI
23
Tartu, EE
22
Zürich, CH
22
Tallinn, EE
20
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
18
NEFlocation not on record
17
MZLUlocation not on record
16
Bern, CH
16
NCMGlocation not on record
12
Trondheim, NO
12
Olocation not on record
10
Fribourg, CH
7
ZSMlocation not on record
6
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
6
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)location not on record
5
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
5
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
5
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
4
Nijmegen, NL
3
Salzburg, AT
3
CBDClocation not on record
3
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
3
BioFokuslocation not on record
3
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
3
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
2
IZNElocation not on record
2
2
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
1
LSMlocation not on record
1
Philadelphia, US
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
40 institutions · 714 of 1 080 vouchered records shown · 366 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA34 detections
Where the DNA of Anoplodera sexguttata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found34
Studies independent surveys2
Countries8
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 34 detections have coordinates
Open the map8 countries0
aus der Kraut- und Strauchschicht gekeschert…forest pathLaubwald
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.4 °C 12.2–19.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter16.9 °C
Max temp (day)18.1 °C 16.0–24.0
Min temp (night)9.90 °C 7.40–13.4
Precipitation70.1 mm/mo 45.9–83.0
Air humidity59.6 % 53.8–60.4
Moisture balance-46.7 mm/mo -96.9–-25.1
Vapour deficit662 Pa 574–1,030
Wind speed3.50 m/s 2.30–4.60
Cloud cover36.0 % 31.8–42.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 34 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.