Anoplius caviventris

(Aurivillus, 1907) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Pompilidae/Anoplius

At a glance

Occurrence records346

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens13

eDNA detections12

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Anoplius caviventris's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility346 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI12 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics13 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF346 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 8 countries12 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD13 specimens

01Narrative

De riet-borstelspinnendoder is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie van de spinnendoders (Pompilidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1907 door Aurivillius.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding13 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anoplius caviventris has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens13

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections12

Countries8

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P652 bp consensus3 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 88% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)8.1%

Haplotypes1

BIN1

Where individuals differ — all 76 variable positions, in barcode order

43Tvariable

271Avariable

485Avariable

486Avariable

489Tvariable

491Tvariable

493Tvariable

494Tvariable

496Avariable

498Tvariable

501Gvariable

502Tvariable

504Gvariable

505Avariable

507Cvariable

509Gvariable

510Tvariable

513Tvariable

514Avariable

515Avariable

517Tvariable

518Avariable

519Cvariable

521Gvariable

522Cvariable

524Tvariable

525Tvariable

526Tvariable

527Cvariable

528Tvariable

532Avariable

533Tvariable

535Avariable

540Cvariable

545Cvariable

548Gvariable

550Tvariable

551Tvariable

552Tvariable

555Cvariable

557Gvariable

558Gvariable

559Gvariable

562Avariable

563Avariable

564Tvariable

565Tvariable

566Avariable

571Avariable

572Tvariable

573Tvariable

574Gvariable

575Tvariable

579Cvariable

580Avariable

581Gvariable

582Avariable

583Tvariable

584Cvariable

585Gvariable

586Tvariable

587Avariable

590Tvariable

591Tvariable

594Gvariable

595Avariable

596Avariable

597Cvariable

598Avariable

600Cvariable

601Tvariable

602Tvariable

603Tvariable

604Tvariable

605Tvariable

606Tvariable

TACATTATATTTTATATTTGGAATATGATCAGGAGCAGTAGGTACTTCATTGAGAATATTAATTCGAATTGAATTGGGGAGGCCCGGTCA …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Anoplius virginiensissame genus12.0%Anoplius tolucasame genus13.8%Anoplius ventralissame genus13.8%Anoplius alpinobalticussame genus14.0%Anoplius insolenssame genus14.1%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type346 records

Wild obs. + sensor150

Museum / vouchered196

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO804 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km

≤100 m 59≤1 km 59≤10 km 23

141 georeferenced · 9 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor150

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km

≤100 m 38≤1 km 25≤10 km 69>10 km 1

133 georeferenced · 63 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence196

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions8 of 16 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Helsinki, FI	62
Philadelphia, US	53
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	25
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	14
NMOKlocation not on record	11
ZSMlocation not on record	4
Kuopio, FI	4
Zürich, CH	4
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record	2
South Kensington, GB	2
Trondheim, NO	2
Metsähallituslocation not on record	2
Bonn, DE	1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record	1
Stockholm, SE	1
CBDClocation not on record	1

16 institutions · 189 of 196 vouchered records shown · 7 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA12 detections

Where the DNA of Anoplius caviventris was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found12

Studies independent surveys1

Countries8

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 12 detections have coordinates

Open the map8 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.7 °C 14.5–18.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter19.3 °C

Max temp (day)20.9 °C 16.8–22.2

Min temp (night)11.8 °C 10.2–13.5

Precipitation104 mm/mo 60.6–163

Air humidity59.6 % 58.6–61.1

Moisture balance-22.0 mm/mo -46.7–17.9

Vapour deficit791 Pa 654–817

Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.40–3.80

Cloud cover41.3 % 35.3–50.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 11 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)