Het roodbuikje is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1832 door Imhoff.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena ventralis has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens71
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections56
Countries4
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P651 bp consensus49 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 2 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.30%
Haplotypes9
BINs2
Most divergent pair2.5%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type7 949 records
Wild obs. + sensor5 590
Museum / vouchered2 338
Cultivated / captive1
Other20
Origin
Native738
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 704 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy6% within 1 km
≤100 m 199≤1 km 109≤10 km 4 952>10 km 15
5 275 georeferenced · 315 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor5 590
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy20% within 1 km
≤100 m 48≤1 km 356≤10 km 1 593>10 km 60
2 057 georeferenced · 281 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 338
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions17 of 40 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
319
Zürich, CH
284
Bern, CH
156
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
103
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
81
Philadelphia, US
81
Paro, BT
76
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
72
ULglocation not on record
71
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
59
KZMlocation not on record
50
Dhaka, BD
47
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
40
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
32
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
31
Mons, BE
30
PRAZlocation not on record
26
ZSMlocation not on record
23
NMOKlocation not on record
22
IENElocation not on record
20
Toyama, JP
20
Cambridge, US
19
17
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
16
Fribourg, CH
14
Frauenfeld, CH
12
Wuzhou, CN
10
AGClocation not on record
8
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
8
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
8
Naturkundliche Sammlung Urilocation not on record
7
Bonn, DE
7
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
6
Geneva, CH
6
Sion, CH
4
PRUNlocation not on record
4
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
4
Tilburg, NL
2
Nijmegen, NL
2
MZLUlocation not on record
1
40 institutions · 1 798 of 2 338 vouchered records shown · 540 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA56 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena ventralis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found56
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 56 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.2 °C 8.20–10.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.8 °C
Max temp (day)14.4 °C 11.9–14.6
Min temp (night)5.40 °C 3.00–5.60
Precipitation55.3 mm/mo 45.6–59.4
Air humidity59.8 % 58.4–60.8
Moisture balance-28.0 mm/mo -36.6–-4.90
Vapour deficit505 Pa 446–521
Wind speed3.70 m/s 3.20–4.20
Cloud cover39.2 % 37.5–41.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 54 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility7 949 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI56 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics71 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗