De zilveren zandbij is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1844 door Smith.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena argentata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens29
BINs2
Marker genes1
eDNA detections6
Countries7
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus10 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Diversity (π)0.36%
Haplotypes2
BINs2
Most divergent pair1.8%
Where individuals differ — all 12 variable positions, in barcode order
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 939 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 540
Museum / vouchered1 386
Other13
Origin
Native64
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 360 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy37% within 1 km
≤100 m 344≤1 km 199≤10 km 933>10 km 3
1 479 georeferenced · 61 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 540
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy33% within 1 km
≤100 m 167≤1 km 172≤10 km 680>10 km 4
1 023 georeferenced · 363 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 386
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions19 of 45 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
430
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
262
KZMlocation not on record
86
Wuzhou, CN
67
ZMAAlocation not on record
60
Philadelphia, US
40
ULglocation not on record
36
Zürich, CH
27
Trondheim, NO
26
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
24
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
21
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
21
Mons, BE
21
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
16
NHMOlocation not on record
16
ZSMlocation not on record
14
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
14
NCMGlocation not on record
14
Tilburg, NL
14
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
11
NMOKlocation not on record
10
8
Paro, BT
8
Bonn, DE
7
MZLUlocation not on record
6
Bern, CH
6
Metsähallituslocation not on record
5
Cambridge, US
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
BioFokuslocation not on record
3
Nijmegen, NL
3
US
2
Gothenburg, SE
2
Dhaka, BD
2
PRUNlocation not on record
2
Geneva, CH
2
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
2
CBDClocation not on record
2
Tartu, EE
2
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
2
MNHWlocation not on record
1
Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
1
PRAZlocation not on record
1
neflocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
45 institutions · 1 307 of 1 386 vouchered records shown · 79 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena argentata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.1 °C 12.0–19.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.9 °C
Max temp (day)21.2 °C 16.1–23.4
Min temp (night)12.7 °C 7.90–14.8
Precipitation58.8 mm/mo 45.6–72.4
Air humidity57.4 % 57.2–60.2
Moisture balance-54.5 mm/mo -60.4–-17.2
Vapour deficit831 Pa 563–957
Wind speed2.60 m/s 2.40–2.80
Cloud cover36.1 % 33.7–44.2
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 939 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics29 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗