Andrena truncatilabris

Morawitz, 1877 · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Andrenidae/Andrena

At a glance

Occurrence records91

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens23

eDNA detections12

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Andrena truncatilabris's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility91 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI12 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics23 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF91 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 4 countries12 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD23 specimens

01Narrative

Andrena truncatilabris is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1877 door Morawitz.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding23 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena truncatilabris has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens23

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections12

Countries7

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus21 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 70 variable positions, in barcode order

5Tvariable

25Avariable

40Tvariable

58Tvariable

61Tvariable

74Tvariable

82Tvariable

91Cvariable

112Cvariable

115Cvariable

118Cvariable

119Tvariable

120Cvariable

121Tvariable

124Cvariable

157Cvariable

172Tvariable

178Tvariable

181Tvariable

193Cvariable

232Avariable

235Tvariable

241Amostly conserved

247Cvariable

263Tvariable

280Tvariable

293Avariable

304Tvariable

316Avariable

343Amostly conserved

347Cvariable

355Cvariable

358Tvariable

364Tvariable

376Avariable

385Cvariable

386Tmostly conserved

394Tvariable

406Cvariable

409Cvariable

416Avariable

418Tvariable

433Tvariable

436Avariable

445Cvariable

457Tvariable

500Cvariable

505Cvariable

520Tmostly conserved

526Tvariable

532Cvariable

535Gmostly conserved

536Tvariable

539Cvariable

541Avariable

547Avariable

548Tvariable

550Avariable

556Tvariable

571Tvariable

574Tvariable

580Avariable

581Tvariable

589Cvariable

596Tvariable

628Avariable

634Tmostly conserved

646Tvariable

655Gvariable

658Tmostly conserved

AATATTATACTTTATTTTTGCAATATGAGCAGGAATAATTGGAGCATCACTTAGATTTATTATTCGTATAGAATTAAGAAATCCAGGAAG …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)5.3%

Haplotypes12

BINs2

Most divergent pair10.0%

EuropeAsiaAfrica

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Andrena ferrugineicrussame genus7.9%Andrena medeninensissame genus8.5%Andrena montanasame genus9.0%Andrena rufulasame genus9.9%Andrena symphytisame genus10.3%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type91 records

Wild obs. + sensor5

Museum / vouchered54

Other32

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO224 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 3>10 km 1

4 georeferenced · 1 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor5

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy29% within 1 km

≤100 m 2≤1 km 11≤10 km 17>10 km 15

45 georeferenced · 9 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence54

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions6 of 10 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Zürich, CH	27
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record	5
Cambridge, US	4
Wuzhou, CN	3
	3
UMONSlocation not on record	2
Philadelphia, US	2
OOLMlocation not on record	2
University of Florence, Department of Biologylocation not on record	1
Bonn, DE	1

10 institutions · 50 of 54 vouchered records shown · 4 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA12 detections

Where the DNA of Andrena truncatilabris was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found12

Studies independent surveys1

Countries4

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 12 detections have coordinates

Open the map4 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median14.2 °C 11.1–17.1

Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.4 °C

Max temp (day)18.9 °C 15.6–21.9

Min temp (night)9.20 °C 5.00–11.3

Precipitation42.9 mm/mo 29.2–72.2

Air humidity55.0 % 51.5–55.7

Moisture balance-89.7 mm/mo -107–-35.3

Vapour deficit722 Pa 605–885

Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.00–3.60

Cloud cover35.6 % 34.5–44.8

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 9 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)