Ancistrocerus oviventris is a Palearctic species of potter wasp.BWARS Edward Saunders 1896, The Hymenoptera Aculeata of the British Isles London. pdf us.archive Full text with illustrations]
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ancistrocerus oviventris has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens25
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections1
Countries6
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus21 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 99% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 8 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.29%
Haplotypes4
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.46%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P18S-5P
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type6 586 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 203
Museum / vouchered4 338
Other45
Origin
Native998
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO11 272 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 072≤1 km 557≤10 km 460>10 km 1
2 090 georeferenced · 113 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 203
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy28% within 1 km
≤100 m 517≤1 km 634≤10 km 2 855>10 km 145
4 151 georeferenced · 187 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence4 338
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions18 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
777
Zürich, CH
534
Bern, CH
480
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
370
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
331
Paro, BT
298
Trondheim, NO
120
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
119
Dhaka, BD
101
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
94
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
62
Philadelphia, US
55
Geneva, CH
51
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
45
NHMOlocation not on record
41
neflocation not on record
35
BioFokuslocation not on record
29
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
24
NMOKlocation not on record
19
CBDClocation not on record
19
Frauenfeld, CH
18
ZMAAlocation not on record
18
Stockholm, SE
17
ZSMlocation not on record
16
Rovaniemi, FI
15
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
12
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
11
Tilburg, NL
11
Gothenburg, SE
11
Metsähallituslocation not on record
11
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
10
MZLUlocation not on record
9
Tartu, EE
7
PRAZlocation not on record
6
NCMGlocation not on record
5
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
4
Sion, CH
4
Naturkundliche Sammlung Urilocation not on record
2
Naturhistorisches Museum Wienlocation not on record
2
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
2
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
2
Fribourg, CH
2
Winterthur, CH
2
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
1
UGRlocation not on record
1
Kuopio, FI
1
46 institutions · 3 804 of 4 338 vouchered records shown · 534 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA1 detections
Where the DNA of Ancistrocerus oviventris was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found1
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 1 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.8 °C 14.8–14.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.4 °C
Max temp (day)19.1 °C
Min temp (night)10.4 °C
Precipitation69.4 mm/mo
Air humidity59.8 %
Moisture balance-40.5 mm/mo
Vapour deficit677 Pa
Wind speed2.70 m/s
Cloud cover38.4 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.