Anania funebris is a species of moth of the family Crambidae. Its common name is the White-spotted Sable. It is found in Europe, Siberia, the Northern parts of the Far East and North America. The wingspan is 20–23 mm (0.79-0.92 in). The forewings are black; a large round white subdorsal spot before middle, and a second in disc beyond middle ; sometimes a white dot above first ; cilia white towards tips. Hindwings as forewings, but without the white dot.The larva is ochreous-whitish ; dorsalline deep green ; subdorsal and lateral green ; spiracular whitish-green ; dots green ; head whitish-brown.Meyrick, E., 1895 A Handbook of British Lepidoptera MacMillan, London pdf Keys and description The moth flies from June to July depending on the location. Figs 4, 4a, 4b larvae after final moult 4c enlargement of two segments 4 under a lowermost leaf of Solidago virgaurea The larvae feed on Solidago virgaurea.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anania funebris has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens107
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections136
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus94 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 16 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.2%
Haplotypes17
BIN1
Most divergent pair2.7%
N.AmericaEuropeAsia
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualAnania funebris carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈565 047 306 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Anania funebris0.57 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness99.8% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type11 164 records
Wild obs. + sensor9 070
Museum / vouchered1 929
Other165
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO27 244 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy86% within 1 km
≤100 m 4 264≤1 km 2 547≤10 km 846>10 km 293
7 950 georeferenced · 1 120 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9 070
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy44% within 1 km
≤100 m 270≤1 km 467≤10 km 563>10 km 361
1 661 georeferenced · 268 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 929
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 62 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
596
New Haven, US
190
NHMOlocation not on record
143
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
97
Tromsø, NO
69
Tartu, EE
56
Salzburg, AT
52
Zürich, CH
50
Philadelphia, US
37
RMZlocation not on record
34
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
31
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record
31
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
30
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
28
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
26
Rovaniemi, FI
22
ZMAAlocation not on record
21
Kuopio, FI
21
DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record
17
St. Paul, US
16
Cleveland Museum of Natural History, OH (CLEV)location not on record
16
Edmonton, CA
16
BioFokuslocation not on record
9
Cambridge, US
7
Metsähallituslocation not on record
7
Philadelphia, US
7
Vernal, US
6
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
6
Stockholm, SE
6
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
5
East Lansing, US
5
Toronto, CA
4
South Kensington, GB
4
neflocation not on record
4
Oregon State Arthropod Collectionlocation not on record
4
Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record
3
MZLUlocation not on record
3
University of Kaiserslauternlocation not on record
3
North Carolina State University Insect Museumlocation not on record
2
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
2
Nijmegen, NL
2
Mississippi State, US
2
Georgia Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
2
University of Guelphlocation not on record
2
ZSMlocation not on record
2
Royal Ontario Museumlocation not on record
1
KNAMlocation not on record
1
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
National Institute of Biological Resourceslocation not on record
1
Tomioka, JP
1
Biodiversity Institute of Ontariolocation not on record
1
Decorah, US
1
San Francisco, US
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
SOVTlocation not on record
1
Espace pour la vielocation not on record
1
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
1
CBDClocation not on record
1
62 institutions · 1 714 of 1 929 vouchered records shown · 215 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA136 detections
Where the DNA of Anania funebris was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found136
Studies independent surveys3
Countries10
Verifiable raw sequence linked34
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 136 detections have coordinates
Open the map10 countries0
WetlandMixed habitatGrassland4. Native GrasslandTemperate mixed forestRiparian Zone
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.6 °C 9.80–18.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.6 °C
Max temp (day)17.6 °C 13.8–23.9
Min temp (night)9.20 °C 4.50–14.0
Precipitation84.3 mm/mo 66.0–125
Air humidity57.2 % 55.2–61.1
Moisture balance-42.7 mm/mo -65.5–10.8
Vapour deficit676 Pa 479–912
Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.00–4.00
Cloud cover46.0 % 36.9–53.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 123 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation6 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility11 164 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI136 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics107 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗