Amphipoea oculea, the ear moth, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. It was first described by Carl Linnaeus in 1761 and it is found in most of the Palearctic realm. Mounted The wingspan is 29–34 mm. Forewing pale or dark ferruginous brown; the veins brown; inner and outer lines double, brown, wide apart; the inner curved outwards between, and toothed inwards on, the veins; the outer with the inner arm thin, lunulate-dentate, the outer thick, continuous and parallel; a thick dark median shade running between the stigmata; submarginal line indistinct, waved, angled on vein 7, above which it is preceded by a dark costal patch; orbicular stigma rounded, orange, with a brown ring; reniform white, with the veins across it brown and containing on the discocellular a brown-outlined lunule, of which the centre is yellowish; the colour with brown outline; hindwing fuscous grey, paler towards base; the fringe rufous tinged.Seitz, A. Ed., 1914 Die Großschmetterlinge der Erde, Verlag Alfred Kernen, Stuttgart Band 3: Abt. 1, Die Großschmetterlinge des palaearktischen Faunengebietes, Die palaearktischen eulenartigen Nachtfalter, 1914 Adults are found from June to September depending on the location. There is one generation per year. Habitat, Ireland Figs 2 young larva 2a, 2b, 2c, 2d larva after last moult The larvae feed on the stems and roots of various grasses and low plants, including Petasites hybridus.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Amphipoea oculea has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens45
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections51
Countries11
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus41 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 2 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.18%
Haplotypes9
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.46%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualAmphipoea oculea carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈669 248 832 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Amphipoea oculea0.67 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness98.9% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type53 157 records
Wild obs. + sensor46 072
Museum / vouchered6 293
Other792
Origin
Native4 815
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO33 368 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy55% within 1 km
≤100 m 17 978≤1 km 7 314≤10 km 20 182>10 km 144
45 618 georeferenced · 454 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor46 072
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 646≤1 km 1 850≤10 km 2 314>10 km 99
5 909 georeferenced · 384 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence6 293
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 57 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record
1 210
Helsinki, FI
975
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
879
Kuopio, FI
300
Bern, CH
216
Zürich, CH
161
NHMOlocation not on record
121
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
115
Tartu, EE
98
Salzburg, AT
87
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
71
Geneva, CH
60
Archäologie und Museum Baselland - Museum.BLlocation not on record
51
Naturama Aargaulocation not on record
50
ZMAAlocation not on record
47
Paro, BT
46
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
45
Fribourg, CH
44
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
43
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
40
MZLUlocation not on record
34
SFRAlocation not on record
32
Dhaka, BD
29
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
25
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
25
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
22
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
21
Tallinn, EE
21
Nijmegen, NL
19
Podgorica, ME
17
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
16
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
13
Glarus, CH
10
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
10
Frauenfeld, CH
10
Winterthur, CH
10
Metsähallituslocation not on record
8
Tromsø, NO
8
Sion, CH
8
UMUlocation not on record
7
Stockholm, SE
6
DABUHlocation not on record
6
Rovaniemi, FI
5
Cambridge, US
5
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
4
Zoological Museum of the University of Chittagong, Bangladeshlocation not on record
4
NCMGlocation not on record
3
neflocation not on record
3
South Kensington, GB
3
Musée de Saint-Imierlocation not on record
2
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
2
ZSMlocation not on record
2
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
2
Philadelphia, US
2
ЗММУlocation not on record
2
John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Research Collection of G. Orhantlocation not on record
1
57 institutions · 5 057 of 6 293 vouchered records shown · 1 236 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA51 detections
Where the DNA of Amphipoea oculea was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found51
Studies independent surveys2
Countries11
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 51 detections have coordinates
Open the map11 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.2 °C 4.30–17.7
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.2 °C
Max temp (day)18.2 °C 8.30–21.9
Min temp (night)11.4 °C -0.6–14.5
Precipitation101 mm/mo 63.2–188
Air humidity62.6 % 59.2–65.6
Moisture balance16.0 mm/mo -47.5–118
Vapour deficit638 Pa 336–814
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.30–4.50
Cloud cover43.5 % 35.6–51.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 49 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.