Alpheus paracrinitus is een garnalensoort uit de familie van de Alpheidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1881 door Miers.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Alpheus paracrinitus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens29
BINs7
Marker genes3
eDNA detections25
Countries6
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus16 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 66% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 223 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)14.3%
Haplotypes9
BINs7
Most divergent pair21.3%
N.AmericaAsia
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-3P★COI-5P16S
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type680 records
Wild obs. + sensor66
Museum / vouchered614
Origin
Native7
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO1 032 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit56
200–1000 m twilight0
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 11 m · max 43 m · 56 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy52% within 1 km
≤100 m 16≤10 km 7>10 km 8
31 georeferenced · 35 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor66
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy83% within 1 km
≤100 m 80≤1 km 9≤10 km 15>10 km 3
107 georeferenced · 507 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence614
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions9 of 28 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
96
Mexico City, MX
61
Instituto Oceanográfico del Pacífico, Secretaría de Marinalocation not on record
57
Washington, US
45
Paris, FR
42
Honolulu, US
22
Unidad Multidisciplinaria de Docencia e Investigación, Campus Sisal, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Méxicolocation not on record
21
FCMMlocation not on record
21
University of Floridalocation not on record
20
UM-RSMASlocation not on record
7
Texas Cooperative Wildlife Collectionlocation not on record
7
Florida Atlantic University, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Museumlocation not on record
6
Museum and Art Gallery of the Northern Territorylocation not on record
3
Museu Nacional/Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeirolocation not on record
3
Laboratorio de Ecosistemas Marinos y Acuicultura, Centro Universitario de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Guadalajaralocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Alabama Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
2
Universidad del Marlocation not on record
2
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
2
National Marine Biodiversity Institute of Korealocation not on record
2
Sistema de Colecciones Biológicas, Escuela de Biología, Universidad de San Carlos de Guatemala location not on record
1
Chiba, JP
1
CASlocation not on record
1
Instituto de Investigaciones Marinas y Costeras José Benito Vives de Andreis - Invemarlocation not on record
1
Brussels, BE
1
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
1
Sydney, AU
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
28 institutions · 431 of 614 vouchered records shown · 23 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA25 detections
Where the DNA of Alpheus paracrinitus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found25
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 25 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
patch reefPatch reef
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median20.1 °C 20.1–26.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter3.90 °C
Max temp (day)22.7 °C 22.7–27.8
Min temp (night)18.1 °C 18.1–24.2
Precipitation90.5 mm/mo 90.5–371
Air humidity71.8 % 66.0–71.8
Moisture balance-73.7 mm/mo
Vapour deficit663 Pa 663–1,137
Wind speed5.40 m/s
Cloud cover33.6 % 33.6–39.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 11 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.