Allantus melanarius

(Klug, 1818) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Tenthredinidae/Allantus

At a glance

Occurrence records46

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens8

eDNA detections15

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Allantus melanarius's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility46 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI15 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics8 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF46 records

Environmental DNA3 datasets · 5 countries15 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD8 specimens

01Narrative

Allantus melanarius, Syn.: Emphytus melanarius, ist eine Pflanzenwespe aus der Familie der Echten Blattwespen (Tenthredinidae). Die Art wurde im Jahr 1814 von Johann Christoph Friedrich Klug als Tenthredo melanaria erstbeschrieben.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding8 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Allantus melanarius has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens8

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections15

Countries5

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus8 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 71 variable positions, in barcode order

2Avariable

3Cvariable

6Tvariable

7Avariable

9Avariable

11Tvariable

14Avariable

17Tvariable

18Tvariable

19Tvariable

20Gvariable

21Gvariable

22Avariable

24Tvariable

25Tvariable

27Gvariable

29Tvariable

30Cvariable

32Gvariable

33Gvariable

35Avariable

38Tvariable

39Tvariable

41Gvariable

42Gvariable

45Tvariable

48Cvariable

49Avariable

50Tvariable

51Tvariable

52Tvariable

54Gvariable

56Avariable

59Tvariable

61Avariable

62Avariable

63Tvariable

64Tvariable

65Cvariable

66Gvariable

68Avariable

69Cvariable

71Gvariable

72Avariable

74Tvariable

75Tvariable

76Avariable

77Gvariable

78Gvariable

79Tvariable

80Avariable

81Tvariable

82Amostly conserved

83Cvariable

84Cvariable

86Gvariable

87Gvariable

89Tvariable

90Cvariable

94Avariable

95Avariable

96Tvariable

97Tvariable

99Gvariable

100Avariable

430Gmostly conserved

433Gmostly conserved

475Gmostly conserved

478Amostly conserved

518Cmostly conserved

628Amostly conserved

AACATTATATTTTATTTTTGGATTTTGATCAGGAATATTAGGATTATCATTTAGAATATTAATTCGAACAGAATTAGGTATACCAGGATC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)5.5%

Haplotypes3

BIN1

Most divergent pair0.30%

Europe

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Monostegia abdominalissame family9.0%Ametastegia tenerasame family10.4%Ametastegia perlasame family10.6%Ametastegia apertasame family10.8%Dolerus nimbosussame family10.9%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type46 records

Wild obs. + sensor27

Museum / vouchered19

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO144 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km

≤100 m 10≤1 km 3≤10 km 9

22 georeferenced · 5 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor27

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy20% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤10 km 4

5 georeferenced · 14 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence19

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
ZSMlocation not on record	5
Zürich, CH	4
Stockholm, SE	1
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record	1

4 institutions · 11 of 19 vouchered records shown · 8 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA15 detections

Where the DNA of Allantus melanarius was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found15

Studies independent surveys3

Countries5

Verifiable raw sequence linked6

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 15 detections have coordinates

Open the map5 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median16.1 °C 13.2–19.3

Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.6 °C

Max temp (day)18.9 °C 17.6–23.6

Min temp (night)11.1 °C 8.40–15.4

Precipitation66.7 mm/mo 41.3–117

Air humidity58.8 % 57.4–61.6

Moisture balance-63.3 mm/mo -87.9–3.50

Vapour deficit737 Pa 630–944

Wind speed3.30 m/s 2.00–5.10

Cloud cover35.7 % 32.0–40.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 15 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)