Agelenopsis oklahoma

(Gertsch, 1936) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Agelenidae/Agelenopsis

At a glance

Occurrence records191

Data sources8

Biological traits0

DNA specimens9

eDNA detections5

Sources8 archives

Databases and archives Agelenopsis oklahoma's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility191 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI5 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics9 specimens↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF191 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries5 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD9 specimens

01Narrative

Agelenopsis oklahoma is a species of funnel weaver in the spider family Agelenidae. It is found in the United States and Canada.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding9 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Agelenopsis oklahoma has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens9

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections5

Countries2

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus9 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 89% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)4.7%

Haplotypes1

BINs2

Where individuals differ — all 72 variable positions, in barcode order

14Amostly conserved

17Tmostly conserved

18Tmostly conserved

21Gmostly conserved

23Gmostly conserved

24Cmostly conserved

25Tmostly conserved

27Gmostly conserved

28Gmostly conserved

29Tmostly conserved

31Tmostly conserved

32Gmostly conserved

33Cmostly conserved

35Amostly conserved

39Tmostly conserved

41Gmostly conserved

42Gmostly conserved

43Gvariable

44Amostly conserved

47Gmostly conserved

48Cmostly conserved

51Tmostly conserved

53Avariable

54Gvariable

55Avariable

56Gvariable

58Tvariable

59Tvariable

61Gvariable

62Avariable

63Tvariable

64Tvariable

65Cvariable

66Gvariable

67Gvariable

68Avariable

69Tvariable

70Tvariable

71Gvariable

72Avariable

73Amostly conserved

74Tvariable

75Tvariable

76Avariable

77Gvariable

78Gvariable

79Tvariable

81Avariable

82Avariable

83Cvariable

84Cvariable

85Tvariable

86Gvariable

88Gvariable

89Avariable

90Gvariable

91Avariable

93Avariable

94Tvariable

95Tvariable

96Tvariable

97Gvariable

99Gvariable

127Cmostly conserved

226Cvariable

271Amostly conserved

289Avariable

343Cvariable

373Gvariable

508Gvariable

544Gvariable

628Avariable

TACTTTATATTTGATTTTTGGTGCTTGGTCTGCAATAGTAGGGACAGCAATAAGAGTTTTGATTCGGATTGAATTAGGTCAACCTGGGAG …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Agelenopsis pennsylvanicasame genus5.3%Agelenopsis potterisame genus5.3%Agelenopsis emertonisame genus5.4%Agelenopsis naeviasame genus6.1%Agelenopsis apertasame genus6.2%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type191 records

Museum / vouchered191

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO240 km²

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km

≤100 m 5≤1 km 87≤10 km 21>10 km 3

116 georeferenced · 75 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence191

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions3 of 4 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Denver, US	176
Royal Saskatchewan Museumlocation not on record	8
Cambridge, US	2
US	2

4 institutions · 188 of 191 vouchered records shown · 3 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA5 detections

Where the DNA of Agelenopsis oklahoma was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found5

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 5 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

4. Native Grassland | 4.4. Temperate Grassland

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.6 °C 18.4–20.8

Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.3 °C

Max temp (day)27.2 °C 26.0–28.4

Min temp (night)11.6 °C 10.3–12.8

Precipitation31.3 mm/mo 24.9–37.7

Air humidity47.0 % 45.4–48.7

Moisture balance-139 mm/mo -152–-125

Vapour deficit1,228 Pa 1,175–1,282

Wind speed2.50 m/s 2.20–2.70

Cloud cover29.7 % 29.5–29.9

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)