Ochlerotatus bancroftianus is een muggensoort uit de familie van de steekmuggen (Culicidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1921 door Edwards.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aedes bancroftianus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens11
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections7
Countries1
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P623 bp consensus7 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 13 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.67%
Haplotypes6
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.80%
OtherOceania
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type252 records
Wild obs. + sensor4
Museum / vouchered248
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO264 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 2≤1 km 1>10 km 1
4 georeferenced
Open the mapobservation + sensor4
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤10 km 3
4 georeferenced · 244 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence248
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions1 of 5 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
University of Queensland Insect Collectionlocation not on record
119
Natick, US
101
Museums Victorialocation not on record
24
Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record
3
BMNHlocation not on record
1
5 institutions · 248 of 248 vouchered records shown
09Environmental DNA7 detections
Where the DNA of Aedes bancroftianus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found7
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 7 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median21.1 °C 21.1–21.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.8 °C
Max temp (day)26.6 °C
Min temp (night)14.7 °C
Precipitation48.3 mm/mo
Air humidity51.0 %
Moisture balance-130 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,224 Pa
Wind speed2.50 m/s
Cloud cover21.6 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
