Diplolepis spinosa

species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Hymenoptera/Cynipidae/Diplolepis

At a glance

Occurrence records1 306

Data sources5

Biological traits0

DNA specimens62

eDNA detections62

Sources5 archives

Databases and archives Diplolepis spinosa's data was compiled from.

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 306 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI62 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics62 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page3 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

Occurrence & distributionGBIF1 306 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries62 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD62 specimens

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding62 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Diplolepis spinosa has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens62

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections62

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P620 bp consensus62 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 93% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)1.6%

Haplotypes0

BINs2

Where individuals differ — all 45 variable positions, in barcode order

1Nhighly variable

2Nhighly variable

3Nhighly variable

4Nhighly variable

5Nhighly variable

6Nhighly variable

7Nhighly variable

8Nhighly variable

9Nhighly variable

10Nhighly variable

11Nhighly variable

12Nhighly variable

13Nhighly variable

14Nhighly variable

15Nhighly variable

16Nhighly variable

17Nhighly variable

18Nhighly variable

19Nhighly variable

27Gvariable

39Amostly conserved

45Avariable

48Gvariable

57Amostly conserved

69Gvariable

102Amostly conserved

222Tvariable

237Tmostly conserved

258Tmostly conserved

265Cmostly conserved

294Cmostly conserved

324Gmostly conserved

345Avariable

354Amostly conserved

366Gmostly conserved

375Gvariable

414Avariable

441Tmostly conserved

471Tmostly conserved

546Gmostly conserved

552Amostly conserved

567Avariable

570Gmostly conserved

600Gmostly conserved

618Tmostly conserved

NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNTGGGGGTGTGATGTGGGATAGTTGGAGCGGCATTAAGAATAATTATTCGGGTAGAACTTGGGGTTGCAAGG …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Diplolepis radicumsame genus6.1%Diplolepis californicasame genus6.6%Diplolepis triformasame genus6.6%Diplolepis oregonensissame genus8.4%Diplolepis fusiformanssame genus11.3%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type1 306 records

Wild obs. + sensor1 229

Museum / vouchered77

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO2 884 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy92% within 1 km

≤100 m 629≤1 km 133≤10 km 35>10 km 28

825 georeferenced · 404 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor1 229

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy0% within 1 km

≤10 km 18

18 georeferenced · 59 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence77

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Champaign, US	18
Chicago, US	4
University of Guelphlocation not on record	1

3 institutions · 23 of 77 vouchered records shown · 54 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA62 detections

Where the DNA of Diplolepis spinosa was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found62

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 62 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median8.40 °C 5.20–11.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter30.9 °C

Max temp (day)13.9 °C 11.7–19.0

Min temp (night)3.00 °C 0–8.20

Precipitation74.2 mm/mo 51.2–128

Air humidity55.5 % 53.8–59.6

Moisture balance-22.9 mm/mo -42.8–8.50

Vapour deficit490 Pa 389–646

Wind speed2.70 m/s 2.30–4.00

Cloud cover50.3 % 40.8–62.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 61 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)

Diplolepis spinosa

At a glance

Sources5 archives

At a glance

Record type1 306 records

Range

Wildobservation + sensor

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Wildobservation + sensor

Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated

Signal

Where its DNA was found

How strong is each trace?

Modelled climatemodelled

Record type1 306 records