Apotolype brevicrista

(Dyar, 1895) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Lasiocampidae/Apotolype

At a glance

Occurrence records753

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens46

eDNA detections14

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Apotolype brevicrista's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility753 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI14 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics46 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF753 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries14 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD46 specimens

01Narrative

Apotolype brevicrista is een vlinder uit de familie van de spinners (Lasiocampidae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1895 door Dyar.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding46 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apotolype brevicrista has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens46

BINs3

Marker genes1

eDNA detections14

Countries3

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus39 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 91% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 57 variable positions, in barcode order

4Tvariable

46Cvariable

50Tmostly conserved

79Avariable

82Tvariable

85Tvariable

88Tmostly conserved

94Tvariable

97Cvariable

127Tvariable

133Cvariable

193Tmostly conserved

212Tvariable

223Tvariable

235Tvariable

238Avariable

266Tvariable

290Avariable

319Cvariable

328Cvariable

355Tvariable

376Tvariable

382Tvariable

386Cvariable

400Tmostly conserved

403Tvariable

406Tvariable

412Tvariable

415Tvariable

421Avariable

428Cvariable

439Tvariable

451Amostly conserved

470Tvariable

472Avariable

478Tvariable

499Avariable

517Tvariable

520Avariable

532Tvariable

541Tvariable

542Cvariable

544Tvariable

548Tvariable

550Avariable

553Avariable

556Avariable

562Gvariable

574Avariable

589Tvariable

601Cvariable

604Gvariable

607Tmostly conserved

610Cvariable

631Amostly conserved

637Avariable

646Tvariable

AACTTTATATTTTTTTTTTGGAATTTGAGCAGGAATAGTAGGAACCTCTTTAAGTTTATTAATTCGAGCAGAATTAGGAACTCCTAATTC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)4.0%

Haplotypes7

BINs3

Most divergent pair7.9%

N.America

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Apotolype blanchardisame genus4.6%Tolype nigricariasame family7.1%Tolype caietasame family8.1%Nemoria festariasame order8.5%Nemoria bifilatasame order8.7%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type753 records

Wild obs. + sensor290

Museum / vouchered463

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO836 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy82% within 1 km

≤100 m 152≤1 km 35≤10 km 13>10 km 28

228 georeferenced · 62 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor290

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy12% within 1 km

≤100 m 22≤1 km 3≤10 km 179>10 km 1

205 georeferenced · 258 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence463

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions7 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record	224
ASUlocation not on record	176
Washington, US	23
US	8
East Lansing, US	7
Denver, US	6
Mississippi State, US	4
New Haven, US	3
Instituto Nacional de Biodiversidad, Costa Ricalocation not on record	3
Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y Agropecuarias, Universidad de Colimalocation not on record	3
University of California, Davislocation not on record	3
Ciudad de México, MX	2
Smithsonian Institution, National Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record	1

13 institutions · 463 of 463 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA14 detections

Where the DNA of Apotolype brevicrista was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found14

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 14 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median23.1 °C 22.9–25.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter2.40 °C

Max temp (day)26.4 °C 25.8–30.3

Min temp (night)20.2 °C 19.6–22.6

Precipitation205 mm/mo 32.7–416

Air humidity69.2 % 60.8–75.5

Moisture balance73.1 mm/mo -151–292

Vapour deficit865 Pa 731–1,237

Wind speed4.60 m/s 2.50–6.60

Cloud cover32.0 % 14.7–39.1

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 14 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)