Apodrepanulatrix litaria, the large banded wave, is a species of geometrid moth in the family Geometridae. The MONA or Hodges number for Apodrepanulatrix litaria is 6694.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apodrepanulatrix litaria has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens15
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections2
Countries2
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus15 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type64 records
Wild obs. + sensor21
Museum / vouchered43
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO148 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy78% within 1 km
≤100 m 4≤1 km 10≤10 km 3>10 km 1
18 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor21
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy79% within 1 km
≤100 m 14≤1 km 8≤10 km 6
28 georeferenced · 15 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence43
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions5 of 10 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Colorado State Universitylocation not on record
23
Mississippi State, US
5
New Haven, US
4
Vernal, US
3
St. Paul, US
2
San Diego, US
1
University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Sam Noble Oklahoma Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record
1
Royal British Columbia Museumlocation not on record
1
10 institutions · 42 of 43 vouchered records shown · 1 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Apodrepanulatrix litaria was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median5.20 °C 5.20–5.20
Seasonal swing summer↔winter25.1 °C
Max temp (day)11.2 °C
Min temp (night)-1.10 °C
Precipitation33.5 mm/mo
Air humidity53.5 %
Moisture balance-49.4 mm/mo
Vapour deficit414 Pa
Wind speed2.40 m/s
Cloud cover40.0 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
