Apamea monoglypha
(Hufnagel, 1766) · speciesAt a glance
Sources9 archives
Databases and archives Apamea monoglypha's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation6 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility620 674 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI236 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics133 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Larva Pupa Apamea monoglypha, the dark arches, is a moth of the family Noctuidae. The species was first described by Johann Siegfried Hufnagel in 1766. It is a common, sometimes abundant, European species. It is found in most of Europe except northernmost Fennoscandia and the southern parts of the Iberian Peninsula and Greece. The species is also found in Anatolia, Turkestan, Western Asia and Central Asia, Siberia and Mongolia. In the Alps it is found up to heights of 2,500 meters. The smaller subspecies sardoa is found on Sardinia and Corsica. This species has a wingspan of 46 to 54 mm, the forewings varying from pale greyish brown to almost black and cryptically patterned. All but the darkest individuals usually have an obvious black mark close to the dorsum and a pale zigzag subterminal line. The hindwings are whitish with darker venation and a dark shaded band at the margin. The larva is dull whitish grey or dark grey; dorsal line pale: lateral line broadly pale; tubercles large and black; head and thoracic plate brown black.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Diet & foraging2
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Apamea monoglypha has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Apamea monoglypha carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Record type620 674 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions26 of 78 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| DanishLepidopterologicalSocietylocation not on record | 4 426 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 1 637 |
| Helsinki, FI | 1 179 |
| Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record | 691 |
| Zürich, CH | 633 |
| Bern, CH | 438 |
| Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record | 284 |
| Geneva, CH | 283 |
| NHMOlocation not on record | 254 |
| Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record | 245 |
| Zoological Museum of the University of Chittagong, Bangladeshlocation not on record | 216 |
| Kuopio, FI | 213 |
| Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record | 208 |
| Dhaka, BD | 202 |
| Salzburg, AT | 169 |
| NTNU-VMlocation not on record | 164 |
| Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record | 157 |
| Tartu, EE | 131 |
| ZMAAlocation not on record | 115 |
| Paro, BT | 97 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 95 |
| Fribourg, CH | 91 |
| Naturama Aargaulocation not on record | 84 |
| Glarus, CH | 82 |
| Sion, CH | 80 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 75 |
| Frauenfeld, CH | 69 |
| Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record | 65 |
| Archäologie und Museum Baselland - Museum.BLlocation not on record | 64 |
| NMOKlocation not on record | 57 |
| CBDClocation not on record | 57 |
| UMUlocation not on record | 50 |
| Winterthur, CH | 50 |
| Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record | 48 |
| Philadelphia, US | 42 |
| Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record | 40 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 36 |
| Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record | 33 |
| Tallinn, EE | 25 |
| Stockholm, SE | 25 |
| Podgorica, ME | 23 |
| SFRAlocation not on record | 22 |
| Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record | 21 |
| Nijmegen, NL | 15 |
| Durban Natural Science Museumlocation not on record | 14 |
| Tromsø, NO | 14 |
| ZSMlocation not on record | 12 |
| neflocation not on record | 11 |
| Metsähallituslocation not on record | 10 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 9 |
| John May Museum of Natural Historylocation not on record | 8 |
| Musée de Saint-Imierlocation not on record | 7 |
| ННПМ НАНУlocation not on record | 6 |
| Brussels, BE | 5 |
| Cambridge, US | 5 |
| UGRlocation not on record | 5 |
| NCMGlocation not on record | 5 |
| South Kensington, GB | 4 |
| New Haven, US | 3 |
| ЗМ СО РАНlocation not on record | 3 |
| DABUHlocation not on record | 3 |
| KIRMlocation not on record | 3 |
| KSSlocation not on record | 2 |
| Ugentlocation not on record | 2 |
| Tiroler Landesmuseum Ferdinandeumlocation not on record | 2 |
| Philosophical Societylocation not on record | 2 |
| Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record | 2 |
| NMBU:MINAlocation not on record | 2 |
| ЗММУlocation not on record | 2 |
| МПХУlocation not on record | 2 |
| Banyoles, ES | 1 |
| SZOPKlocation not on record | 1 |
| ИЗШ НАНУlocation not on record | 1 |
| Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record | 1 |
| Research Collection of G. Orhantlocation not on record | 1 |
| Landesmuseum Kärntenlocation not on record | 1 |
| Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record | 1 |
| Rovaniemi, FI | 1 |
Where the DNA of Apamea monoglypha was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.