Anthaxia millefolii

(Fabricius, 1801) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Coleoptera/Buprestidae/Anthaxia

At a glance

Occurrence records2 140

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens7

eDNA detections6

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Anthaxia millefolii's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 140 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI6 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics7 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF2 140 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 2 countries6 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD7 specimens

01Narrative

Anthaxia umbellatarum é uma espécie de insetos coleópteros polífagos pertencente à família Buprestidae. A autoridade científica da espécie é Fabricius, tendo sido descrita no ano de 1787. Trata-se de uma espécie presente no território português.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding7 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Anthaxia millefolii has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens7

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections6

Countries4

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus6 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 90% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Where individuals differ — all 63 variable positions, in barcode order

13Cmostly conserved

49Tvariable

55Avariable

56Cvariable

67Avariable

76Gvariable

82Tvariable

92Cvariable

100Cvariable

106Tvariable

124Tvariable

127Cvariable

142Tvariable

163Tvariable

181Tvariable

184Amostly conserved

190Tvariable

193Cvariable

206Tvariable

212Cmostly conserved

217Tvariable

220Tvariable

235Tvariable

259Tvariable

265Tvariable

268Tvariable

283Tvariable

286Avariable

292Cvariable

307Tvariable

316Avariable

319Tvariable

322Avariable

325Tvariable

328Tvariable

340Cvariable

346Cvariable

352Gvariable

367Cvariable

388Gvariable

397Cvariable

400Cvariable

445Cvariable

463Tvariable

472Avariable

473Avariable

488Gmostly conserved

493Gvariable

496Avariable

500Cvariable

517Tvariable

542Cvariable

550Tvariable

556Tvariable

562Tvariable

574Cvariable

580Avariable

592Cvariable

595Cvariable

616Cvariable

628Gmostly conserved

631Gvariable

652Cvariable

AACATTATATTTCATTTTTGGAGCCTGATCAGGAATAGTAGGAACAGCTCTTAGACTATTAATTCGAGCTGAATTGGGACATCCCGGAAC …

Variant network

Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.

Diversity (π)5.0%

Haplotypes3

BINs2

Most divergent pair9.1%

Europe

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Hydroporus despectussame order16.1%Wyeomyia albosquamatasame order16.9%Nomophila corticalissame order17.0%Eulechria dichroasame order17.2%Anaxipha tinnulasame order17.2%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type2 140 records

Wild obs. + sensor1 390

Museum / vouchered707

Other43

Origin

Native212

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO4 180 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy64% within 1 km

≤100 m 317≤1 km 379≤10 km 377>10 km 23

1 096 georeferenced · 294 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor1 390

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy32% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 69≤10 km 145>10 km 1

216 georeferenced · 491 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence707

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions7 of 14 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record	423
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record	87
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record	61
Bern, CH	36
Paro, BT	8
Zürich, CH	6
Porrentruy, CH	2
Paris, FR	2
Helsinki, FI	2
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova \| Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record	2
MZLUlocation not on record	2
South Kensington, GB	2
Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIAlocation not on record	1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record	1

14 institutions · 635 of 707 vouchered records shown · 72 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA6 detections

Where the DNA of Anthaxia millefolii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found6

Studies independent surveys1

Countries2

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 6 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

MaquisDry chalk grassands

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median19.8 °C 9.20–21.2

Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.2 °C

Max temp (day)23.3 °C 13.2–25.8

Min temp (night)14.2 °C 3.00–16.9

Precipitation40.1 mm/mo 33.2–136

Air humidity57.3 % 53.9–60.4

Moisture balance-120 mm/mo -127–30.1

Vapour deficit991 Pa 463–1,155

Wind speed3.10 m/s 2.20–3.20

Cloud cover39.2 % 36.4–39.9

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)

Anthaxia millefolii

At a glance

Sources7 archives

At a glance

Record type2 140 records

Origin

Range

Wildobservation + sensor

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Wildobservation + sensor

Holding institutions7 of 14 geolocated

Signal

Where its DNA was found

How strong is each trace?

Modelled climatemodelled

Record type2 140 records