Andrena fucata is a Palearctic species of mining bee.BWARSEdward Saunders 1896, The Hymenoptera Aculeata of the British Isles London. pdf us.archive Full text with illustrations]
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena fucata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens33
BINs3
Marker genes1
eDNA detections641
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P647 bp consensus17 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 92% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 49 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)2.0%
Haplotypes3
BINs3
Most divergent pair0.62%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type8 078 records
Wild obs. + sensor3 691
Museum / vouchered4 379
Cultivated / captive4
Other4
Origin
Native806
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO12 772 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy60% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 653≤1 km 546≤10 km 1 453>10 km 8
3 660 georeferenced · 31 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor3 691
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km
≤100 m 882≤1 km 1 049≤10 km 1 852>10 km 82
3 865 georeferenced · 514 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence4 379
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 4 records without
Open the mapnot free-living4
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions23 of 58 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Helsinki, FI
1 481
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
479
ULglocation not on record
195
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
172
Paro, BT
167
Philadelphia, US
140
Trondheim, NO
103
Bern, CH
98
NHMOlocation not on record
94
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
69
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
67
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
66
NMOKlocation not on record
55
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
46
Zürich, CH
42
BioFokuslocation not on record
42
MZLUlocation not on record
41
Stockholm, SE
40
ZMAAlocation not on record
37
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
37
Bonn, DE
35
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
28
CBDClocation not on record
26
PRAZlocation not on record
21
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
18
neflocation not on record
17
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
15
KZMlocation not on record
13
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
12
NCMGlocation not on record
11
Wuzhou, CN
9
South Kensington, GB
9
ZSMlocation not on record
8
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
8
PRUNlocation not on record
8
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
7
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
7
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
7
Tromsø, NO
6
Tilburg, NL
5
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
5
Metsähallituslocation not on record
5
Tartu, EE
5
Gothenburg, SE
5
Champaign, US
5
Dhaka, BD
4
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
4
Sion, CH
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
4
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
3
Mons, BE
3
3
Winterthur, CH
2
Frauenfeld, CH
2
Research Collection of Christophe Prazlocation not on record
2
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
Ghent, BE
1
58 institutions · 3 803 of 4 379 vouchered records shown · 576 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA641 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena fucata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found641
Studies independent surveys4
Countries9
Verifiable raw sequence linked610
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 641 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
1.1. Boreal Forest|1. Forest & WoodlandHay meadow
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.6 °C 10.6–14.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.4 °C
Max temp (day)15.2 °C 14.2–18.9
Min temp (night)7.20 °C 5.90–11.2
Precipitation53.7 mm/mo 42.2–76.0
Air humidity57.8 % 56.7–59.9
Moisture balance-50.3 mm/mo -87.0–-29.2
Vapour deficit554 Pa 541–687
Wind speed3.30 m/s 2.50–3.90
Cloud cover45.4 % 38.6–51.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 638 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation3 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility8 078 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI641 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics33 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗