De zadeldwergzandbij is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1915 door Perkins.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena falsifica has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens32
BINs1
Marker genes1
eDNA detections25
Countries6
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus18 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 97% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 18 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.56%
Haplotypes8
BIN1
Most divergent pair2.1%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 383 records
Wild obs. + sensor480
Museum / vouchered2 848
Cultivated / captive1
Other54
Origin
Native981
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 168 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy43% within 1 km
≤100 m 112≤1 km 90≤10 km 263
465 georeferenced · 15 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor480
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy20% within 1 km
≤100 m 160≤1 km 387≤10 km 2 094>10 km 45
2 686 georeferenced · 162 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 848
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 1 records without
Open the mapnot free-living1
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions15 of 42 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Zürich, CH
554
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
322
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
311
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
198
Bern, CH
118
Dhaka, BD
85
KZMlocation not on record
77
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
40
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
37
PRAZlocation not on record
35
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
32
Trondheim, NO
19
Philadelphia, US
19
Wuzhou, CN
19
Sion, CH
18
ZSMlocation not on record
18
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
16
ULglocation not on record
14
Geneva, CH
14
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
13
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
12
IENElocation not on record
11
NMOKlocation not on record
11
PRUNlocation not on record
10
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
8
Paro, BT
8
NHMOlocation not on record
7
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
4
Champaign, US
3
MZLUlocation not on record
3
3
MNHWlocation not on record
3
Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau Frick | Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Fricklocation not on record
2
Bonn, DE
1
Ugentlocation not on record
1
CBDClocation not on record
1
NCMGlocation not on record
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
Mons, BE
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Ghent, BE
1
neflocation not on record
1
42 institutions · 2 053 of 2 848 vouchered records shown · 794 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA25 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena falsifica was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found25
Studies independent surveys1
Countries6
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 25 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.5 °C 5.40–13.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.8 °C
Max temp (day)14.5 °C 9.70–17.0
Min temp (night)4.80 °C 0.9–9.30
Precipitation61.1 mm/mo 38.7–110
Air humidity58.7 % 57.4–62.0
Moisture balance-26.0 mm/mo -45.8–27.5
Vapour deficit531 Pa 350–622
Wind speed3.50 m/s 2.20–4.50
Cloud cover40.4 % 36.1–46.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 24 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility3 383 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI25 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics32 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗