De goudpootzandbij is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1802 door Kirby.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena chrysosceles has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens35
BINs2
Marker genes2
eDNA detections27
Countries6
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P656 bp consensus17 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 96% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 26 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)1.3%
Haplotypes5
BINs2
Most divergent pair2.1%
EuropeOther
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P16S
animal barcoderibosomal
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualAndrena chrysosceles carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size≈520 219 004 bp assembly estimate
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Andrena chrysosceles0.52 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness96.9% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type10 276 records
Wild obs. + sensor6 561
Museum / vouchered3 693
Cultivated / captive8
Other14
Origin
Native1 337
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO11 004 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy27% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 329≤1 km 338≤10 km 4 556>10 km 1
6 224 georeferenced · 337 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor6 561
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy19% within 1 km
≤100 m 100≤1 km 524≤10 km 2 741>10 km 7
3 372 georeferenced · 321 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence3 693
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 8 records without
Open the mapnot free-living8
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions19 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Zürich, CH
494
ULglocation not on record
449
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
265
Mons, BE
194
Bern, CH
177
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
164
South Kensington, GB
131
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
114
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
81
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
64
PRAZlocation not on record
51
Paro, BT
46
NCMGlocation not on record
43
Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau Frick | Research Institute of Organic Agriculture Fricklocation not on record
42
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
39
Wuzhou, CN
36
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
33
Frauenfeld, CH
32
NMOKlocation not on record
31
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
30
Nijmegen, NL
20
Tilburg, NL
20
CBDClocation not on record
16
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
15
KZMlocation not on record
14
Dhaka, BD
12
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
12
ARTlocation not on record
12
Bonn, DE
11
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
10
PRUNlocation not on record
8
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
7
ZSMlocation not on record
6
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
6
Cambridge, US
5
US
5
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
4
Philadelphia, US
3
Champaign, US
3
Fribourg, CH
3
2
SGAV-and-NHMDlocation not on record
2
Ghent, BE
2
Geneva, CH
1
ENSAT - L'Ecole Nationale Superieure Agronomique de Toulouselocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
1
DFFW2018location not on record
1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
MZLUlocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 2 720 of 3 693 vouchered records shown · 972 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA27 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena chrysosceles was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found27
Studies independent surveys2
Countries6
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 27 detections have coordinates
Open the map6 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.0 °C 8.30–14.6
Seasonal swing summer↔winter15.5 °C
Max temp (day)17.2 °C 11.9–18.6
Min temp (night)9.10 °C 4.50–10.7
Precipitation68.7 mm/mo 52.1–91.3
Air humidity60.4 % 58.7–64.0
Moisture balance-40.9 mm/mo -61.6–42.2
Vapour deficit624 Pa 446–676
Wind speed4.20 m/s 3.20–4.70
Cloud cover43.2 % 36.0–50.1
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 25 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.