De donkere rimpelrug is een vliesvleugelig insect uit de familie Andrenidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1802 door Kirby.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Andrena bimaculata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens40
BINs3
Marker genes1
eDNA detections9
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P654 bp consensus26 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 92% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 51 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)2.6%
Haplotypes5
BINs3
Most divergent pair4.4%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P
animal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 774 records
Wild obs. + sensor846
Museum / vouchered836
Other92
Origin
Native174
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 500 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 255≤1 km 107≤10 km 405>10 km 1
768 georeferenced · 78 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor846
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy25% within 1 km
≤100 m 43≤1 km 117≤10 km 485>10 km 5
650 georeferenced · 186 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence836
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions14 of 41 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Wuzhou, CN
95
Paro, BT
88
KZMlocation not on record
79
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
72
Zürich, CH
58
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
57
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
20
ZSMlocation not on record
19
Natuurpuntlocation not on record
18
MZLUlocation not on record
17
Bonn, DE
13
Bern, CH
12
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
12
Nijmegen, NL
12
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
11
PRAZlocation not on record
11
PRUNlocation not on record
10
MNHWlocation not on record
9
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
8
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
8
ULglocation not on record
7
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
7
Coimbra, PT
7
NCMGlocation not on record
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
4
Universität Zürich, Naturhistorisches Museumlocation not on record
4
Beltsville, US
3
3
CBDClocation not on record
2
Research Collection of Christian Monneratlocation not on record
2
USALlocation not on record
2
Archäologie und Museum Baselland - Museum.BLlocation not on record
2
Mons, BE
2
Philadelphia, US
1
Stockholm, SE
1
NMOKlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
Geneva, CH
1
SGAV-and-NHMDlocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
41 institutions · 689 of 836 vouchered records shown · 147 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Andrena bimaculata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median8.60 °C 0.8–18.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter17.6 °C
Max temp (day)12.7 °C 4.60–22.7
Min temp (night)3.50 °C -5.20–13.7
Precipitation66.7 mm/mo 53.7–114
Air humidity58.1 % 57.5–60.6
Moisture balance-23.9 mm/mo -51.1–47.9
Vapour deficit470 Pa 276–897
Wind speed2.50 m/s 1.80–3.30
Cloud cover39.0 % 34.5–49.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 9 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.