Ampithoe rubricata is een vlokreeftensoort uit de familie van de Ampithoidae. De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1818 door Montagu.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ampithoe rubricata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens40
BINs2
Marker genes3
eDNA detections180
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus31 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 14 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.40%
Haplotypes6
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.61%
N.AmericaEurope
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P18S-5P18S-V4
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type3 364 records
Wild obs. + sensor692
Museum / vouchered1 631
Other1 041
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 276 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit458
200–1000 m twilight1
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 4.9 m · max 240 m · 459 records with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy99% within 1 km
≤100 m 432≤1 km 85≤10 km 3
520 georeferenced · 172 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor692
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy93% within 1 km
≤100 m 464≤1 km 101≤10 km 21>10 km 21
607 georeferenced · 1 024 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 631
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions15 of 36 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Centro de Investigación y de Estudios Avanzados, Unidad Irapuato, Instituto Politécnico Nacionallocation not on record
258
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
164
Stockholm, SE
120
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
85
Gothenburg, SE
85
DASSHlocation not on record
56
Institut Francais pour l'Etude de la Merlocation not on record
54
486location not on record
45
Bergen, NO
42
Tromsø, NO
26
730location not on record
26
CEFASlocation not on record
25
Citadel Hill, GB
25
New Haven, US
24
PNHSlocation not on record
17
Brussels, BE
15
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State Universitylocation not on record
13
RBINS-Scientific Heritagelocation not on record
12
Cambridge, US
10
Baltic Sea Research Institute Warnemündelocation not on record
8
Museum für Naturkunde Berlin (Zoological Collections)location not on record
7
Station Biologique de Roscoff (EDMO:521)location not on record
7
Washington, US
7
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
6
South Kensington, GB
5
Helsinki, FI
5
The Atlantic reference Centrelocation not on record
4
Frankfurt am Main
3
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
2
2
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
2
Saint John, CA
2
Senckenberg Research Institute and Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
ARMS-MBONlocation not on record
1
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
1
Edmonton, CA
1
36 institutions · 1 166 of 1 631 vouchered records shown · 22 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA180 detections
Where the DNA of Ampithoe rubricata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found180
Studies independent surveys3
Countries9
Verifiable raw sequence linked144
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 180 detections have coordinates
Open the map9 countries0
Magrove sediment bedMarina; semi-industrial; 9.5 - Subtidal Sand…Mixed bottomMixed hard bottomRocky shoreSubtidal seagrass bed (Z.marina)
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.0 °C -2.80–17.2
Seasonal swing summer↔winter23.4 °C
Max temp (day)16.3 °C 0.9–21.1
Min temp (night)11.7 °C -6.10–14.6
Precipitation115 mm/mo 93.2–128
Air humidity62.7 % 60.3–65.0
Moisture balance38.8 mm/mo -11.5–92.2
Vapour deficit587 Pa 197–689
Wind speed2.40 m/s 1.80–6.00
Cloud cover56.1 % 51.3–65.9
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 178 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.