Bild des ähnlichen Ampedus sanguinolentus (die Flügeldecken bei A. sanguineus sind fast ganz rot) Der Blutrote Schnellkäfer (Ampedus sanguineus) ist eine Art aus der Familie der Schnellkäfer.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ampedus sanguineus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens62
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections61
Countries10
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus47 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 3 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.22%
Haplotypes12
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.76%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P★ITS2
animal barcodefungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type5 956 records
Wild obs. + sensor4 126
Museum / vouchered1 281
Cultivated / captive5
Other544
Origin
Native434
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO12 484 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy62% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 365≤1 km 833≤10 km 1 264>10 km 64
3 526 georeferenced · 600 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor4 126
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy39% within 1 km
≤100 m 109≤1 km 343≤10 km 700>10 km 15
1 167 georeferenced · 114 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 281
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 5 records without
Open the mapnot free-living5
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions19 of 49 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
147
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
68
Vitoria, ES
66
Paro, BT
60
Olocation not on record
45
Bern, CH
45
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
42
Zürich, CH
35
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
34
NHMOlocation not on record
33
Geneva, CH
31
Tartu, EE
28
Tilburg, NL
21
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
21
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
20
Trondheim, NO
19
Helsinki, FI
18
Salzburg, AT
16
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record
15
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
15
Dhaka, BD
13
MZLUlocation not on record
12
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
10
Fribourg, CH
10
NMOKlocation not on record
10
Cornell University Insect Collectionlocation not on record
9
Frauenfeld, CH
9
Tallinn, EE
8
Philadelphia, US
7
BioFokuslocation not on record
7
neflocation not on record
6
Musee d'Histoire Naturallelocation not on record
6
Kuopio, FI
5
ZSMlocation not on record
5
Copenhagen, DK
4
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
3
Muséum d'histoire naturelle de Lillelocation not on record
2
SFRAlocation not on record
2
ASUlocation not on record
2
University of Sydney, Macleay Museumlocation not on record
2
Tromsø, NO
2
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
2
Department of Molecular Biodiversity, Institute of Systematics and Evolution of Animals of the Polish Academy of Scienceslocation not on record
2
Jyväskylä, FI
2
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
2
Metsähallituslocation not on record
2
LSMlocation not on record
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
1
49 institutions · 926 of 1 281 vouchered records shown · 355 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA61 detections
Where the DNA of Ampedus sanguineus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found61
Studies independent surveys3
Countries10
Verifiable raw sequence linked8
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median10.9 °C 4.90–16.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.0 °C
Max temp (day)14.9 °C 8.60–20.3
Min temp (night)6.40 °C 0.6–11.7
Precipitation75.1 mm/mo 48.2–156
Air humidity60.1 % 58.4–63.1
Moisture balance-20.9 mm/mo -57.2–62.8
Vapour deficit522 Pa 336–753
Wind speed3.40 m/s 1.90–4.30
Cloud cover39.7 % 34.6–49.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 59 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation7 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility5 956 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI61 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics62 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗