Aleochara bilineata
Gyllenhal, 1810 · speciesAt a glance
Sources8 archives
Databases and archives Aleochara bilineata's data was compiled from.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 181 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI236 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics11 specimens↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Aleochara bilineata est une espèce de petits insectes coléoptères appartenant à la famille des staphylinidés. Il a été décrit par Leonard Gyllenhaal en 1810. C'est un prédateur considéré comme un très important auxiliaire de l'agriculture, de la culture fruitière et légumière, car il attaque essentiellement des diptères parasitant les arbres fruitiers, la vigne, les grandes cultures, les cultures légumières et diverses cultures ornementales. Il est donc utilisé en lutte biologique, mais il est aussi très sensible à certains pesticides et à certains fongicides.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Aleochara bilineata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Aleochara bilineata carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Record type1 181 records
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions10 of 36 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 189 |
| WIlocation not on record | 160 |
| Akademia Pomorska w Słupskulocation not on record | 70 |
| NHMOlocation not on record | 62 |
| University of Alberta Museums (UAM)location not on record | 52 |
| Edmonton, CA | 43 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 34 |
| Olocation not on record | 32 |
| Metsähallituslocation not on record | 30 |
| Tromsø, NO | 22 |
| Salzburg, AT | 19 |
| Helsinki, FI | 15 |
| National Museums of Kenyalocation not on record | 10 |
| Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record | 9 |
| Tartu, EE | 6 |
| NTNU-VMlocation not on record | 5 |
| Tallinn, EE | 5 |
| LSMlocation not on record | 5 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 4 |
| neflocation not on record | 3 |
| Kuopio, FI | 3 |
| European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record | 3 |
| Copenhagen, DK | 2 |
| ZMAAlocation not on record | 2 |
| CBDClocation not on record | 2 |
| State Museum of Nature History, Lvivlocation not on record | 2 |
| Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record | 2 |
| University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record | 1 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 1 |
| Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record | 1 |
| Tilburg, NL | 1 |
| IFR-DNFlocation not on record | 1 |
| Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record | 1 |
| Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record | 1 |
| Oulu, FI | 1 |
| Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)location not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Aleochara bilineata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.