Agriotes ustulatus is een keversoort uit de familie kniptorren (Elateridae). De wetenschappelijke naam van de soort is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1783 door Schaller.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Agriotes ustulatus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens33
BINs1
Marker genes3
eDNA detections33
Countries7
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P658 bp consensus28 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 98% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 13 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.75%
Haplotypes8
BIN1
Most divergent pair2.1%
Europe
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-3P★COI-5P18S-5P
animal barcoderibosomal
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 275 records
Wild obs. + sensor976
Museum / vouchered1 185
Other114
Origin
Native541
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 124 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy35% within 1 km
≤100 m 158≤1 km 136≤10 km 527>10 km 12
833 georeferenced · 143 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor976
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy12% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 125≤10 km 897>10 km 23
1 046 georeferenced · 139 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 185
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions16 of 39 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Geneva, CH
125
Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record
76
Paro, BT
69
Bern, CH
66
Zürich, CH
61
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
45
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
44
Fribourg, CH
43
Winterthur, CH
41
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
38
Salzburg, AT
19
Frauenfeld, CH
18
Muséum d'histoire naturelle de Lillelocation not on record
17
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
16
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
15
Dhaka, BD
14
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
12
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
10
MUZOO - Musée d'histoire naturelle de La Chaux-de-Fondslocation not on record
9
NMOKlocation not on record
9
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
8
ZSMlocation not on record
7
Copenhagen, DK
7
Sion, CH
6
Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record
5
University Park, US
5
Tilburg, NL
4
Museum zu Allerheiligen Schaffhausenlocation not on record
4
Paris, FR
4
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
3
Philadelphia, US
3
SFRAlocation not on record
2
Naturmuseum Solothurnlocation not on record
2
MUNlocation not on record
2
Naturmuseum Oltenlocation not on record
2
Helsinki, FI
2
University of Sydney, Macleay Museumlocation not on record
2
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record
1
MZLUlocation not on record
1
39 institutions · 817 of 1 185 vouchered records shown · 366 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA33 detections
Where the DNA of Agriotes ustulatus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found33
Studies independent surveys1
Countries7
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 33 detections have coordinates
Open the map7 countries0
auf Wald- und Auenwiesen von Blüten gesamme…Mischwald
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.0 °C 8.30–20.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter18.6 °C
Max temp (day)21.1 °C 11.9–24.2
Min temp (night)12.4 °C 4.30–14.4
Precipitation76.0 mm/mo 57.5–136
Air humidity60.6 % 58.4–63.7
Moisture balance-13.0 mm/mo -48.5–43.3
Vapour deficit778 Pa 471–857
Wind speed2.90 m/s 2.00–3.40
Cloud cover35.8 % 33.3–41.7
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 30 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.