Admestina tibialis

(C.L.Koch, 1846) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Arachnida/Araneae/Salticidae/Admestina

At a glance

Occurrence records41

Data sources8

Biological traits0

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections3

Sources8 archives

Databases and archives Admestina tibialis's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation5 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility41 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI3 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

World Spider CatalogNaturhist. Museum Bernworld catalog↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF41 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries3 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Admestina tibialis is a species of jumping spider. The species was first described in 1846 by C. L. Koch. These spiders are found in eastern United States from Florida to Connecticut.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Admestina tibialis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

BINs1

Marker genes1

eDNA detections3

Countries1

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P658 bp consensus3 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 91% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)5.9%

Haplotypes2

BIN1

Most divergent pair1.4%

Where individuals differ — all 58 variable positions, in barcode order

1Tvariable

2Avariable

3Cvariable

6Tvariable

7Avariable

9Avariable

10Tvariable

11Tvariable

13Gvariable

14Avariable

17Tvariable

18Tvariable

19Tvariable

21Gvariable

23Gvariable

24Cvariable

27Gvariable

28Avariable

29Tvariable

31Tvariable

32Gvariable

33Cvariable

35Avariable

39Tvariable

41Gvariable

42Gvariable

43Gvariable

44Avariable

46Avariable

47Gvariable

48Cvariable

49Gvariable

51Tvariable

54Gvariable

55Avariable

56Avariable

58Tvariable

59Tvariable

61Avariable

62Avariable

63Tvariable

65Cvariable

66Gvariable

67Tvariable

68Avariable

69Tvariable

70Gvariable

71Gvariable

72Avariable

151Cvariable

166Gvariable

220Gvariable

271Tvariable

352Avariable

469Tvariable

477Avariable

478Avariable

616Tvariable

TACATTATATTTGATTTTTGGAGCATGATCTGCGATGGTGGGGACAGCGATAAGAATTTTAATTCGTATGGAATTAGGTCAAACTGGTTC …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Hentzia grenadasame family12.9%Phintella pandasame family12.9%Heliophanus auratussame family13.1%Platycryptus californicussame family13.5%Trite planicepssame family13.7%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type41 records

Wild obs. + sensor24

Museum / vouchered17

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO148 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy65% within 1 km

≤100 m 9≤1 km 4>10 km 7

20 georeferenced · 4 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor24

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy13% within 1 km

≤1 km 1≤10 km 5>10 km 2

8 georeferenced · 9 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence17

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions6 of 7 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Cambridge, US	5
Denver, US	3
Albuquerque, US	2
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record	2
Chicago, US	1
Chicago, US	1
Champaign, US	1

7 institutions · 15 of 17 vouchered records shown · 2 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA3 detections

Where the DNA of Admestina tibialis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found3

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 3 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

Grassland

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median21.7 °C 16.7–21.7

Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.7 °C

Max temp (day)24.2 °C 19.3–24.5

Min temp (night)19.8 °C 14.9–19.8

Precipitation93.3 mm/mo 90.3–94.5

Air humidity58.3 % 58.1–59.6

Moisture balance-75.5 mm/mo -92.9–-63.1

Vapour deficit1,046 Pa 795–1,078

Wind speed6.10 m/s 5.60–6.60

Cloud cover39.2 % 38.4–42.3

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 3 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)