Acronicta orientalis

(Mann, 1862) · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Animalia/Arthropoda/Insecta/Lepidoptera/Noctuidae/Acronicta

At a glance

Occurrence records15

Data sources6

Biological traits0

DNA specimens5

eDNA detections2

Sources6 archives

Databases and archives Acronicta orientalis's data was compiled from.

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility15 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics5 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF15 records

Environmental DNA1 datasets · 1 countries2 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD5 specimens

01Narrative

Acronicta orientalis is een vlinder uit de familie uilen (Noctuidae). De wetenschappelijke naam is voor het eerst geldig gepubliceerd in 1862 door Mann. De soort komt voor in Europa.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding5 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acronicta orientalis has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens5

BINs2

Marker genes1

eDNA detections2

Countries3

The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen

COI-5P655 bp consensus5 specimens

ACGT

▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies

Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 90% of positions are identical in every specimen.

Diversity (π)5.7%

Haplotypes2

BINs2

Most divergent pair9.8%

Where individuals differ — all 67 variable positions, in barcode order

36Amostly conserved

38Cmostly conserved

41Amostly conserved

47Amostly conserved

57Tvariable

66Avariable

68Tvariable

77Tvariable

80Tvariable

83Tvariable

89Avariable

110Tvariable

131Avariable

137Tvariable

158Gvariable

161Tvariable

167Tvariable

200Cvariable

203Cvariable

210Cvariable

221Tvariable

230Tvariable

233Cvariable

236Cvariable

261Cvariable

263Tvariable

266Cvariable

275Avariable

285Tvariable

296Avariable

338Tvariable

366Avariable

380Avariable

384Tvariable

386Avariable

395Cvariable

399Cvariable

401Cvariable

422Avariable

434Tvariable

475Gvariable

482Cvariable

504Gvariable

510Tvariable

512Tvariable

524Avariable

540Cvariable

545Avariable

546Tvariable

548Avariable

551Avariable

554Avariable

555Cvariable

578Cvariable

602Tvariable

614Cmostly conserved

615Cmostly conserved

616Cmostly conserved

617Tmostly conserved

620Tmostly conserved

623Amostly conserved

626Avariable

629Amostly conserved

635Amostly conserved

638Tmostly conserved

639Tmostly conserved

641Amostly conserved

CATTATATTTTATTTTTGGTATTTGAGCAGGAATAATCGGAACTTCATTAAGATTATTAATTCGAACTGAATTAGGTACTCCTGGATCAT …

Closest relatives by DNA barcode

The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.

Argentostiria koebeleisame family5.6%Stilbia calberlaesame family5.8%Rhabinopteryx subtilissame family6.0%Eogena contamineisame family6.0%Condica begallosame family6.1%

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★COI-5P

animal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type15 records

Wild obs. + sensor2

Museum / vouchered5

Other8

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO40 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km

≤100 m 1>10 km 1

2 georeferenced

Open the mapobservation + sensor2

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy100% within 1 km

≤1 km 2

2 georeferenced · 3 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence5

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions2 of 3 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Bavarian State Collection of Zoologylocation not on record	3
Tartu, EE	1
Zürich, CH	1

3 institutions · 5 of 5 vouchered records shown

09Environmental DNA2 detections

Where the DNA of Acronicta orientalis was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found2

Studies independent surveys1

Countries1

Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 2 detections have coordinates

Open the map1 country0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median15.0 °C 15.0–15.0

Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.0 °C

Max temp (day)18.4 °C

Min temp (night)8.00 °C

Precipitation36.7 mm/mo

Air humidity55.6 %

Moisture balance-59.5 mm/mo

Vapour deficit757 Pa

Wind speed1.90 m/s

Cloud cover38.7 %

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)