Acanthoscelides obtectus
(Say, 1831) · speciesAt a glance
Sources13 archives
Databases and archives Acanthoscelides obtectus's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation11 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 038 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI231 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics392 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinegenome & karyotype↗
Tree of SexTree of Sex Consortiumgenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Acanthoscelides obtectus, the bean weevil, is a species of beetle. The species was described in 1831 by Thomas Say. Bean weevils feed on vetches, beans and other leguminous plants. They are generally considered a pest species for this reason. Originating in Central America they have been inadvertently spread around the world in grain shipments.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Acanthoscelides obtectus across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile1 class
Documented compounds3 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lupenone | present | NPASS | |
| Methyl (e)-2,4,5-tetradecatrienoate | present | LOTUS | |
| Methyl 2,4,5-tetradecatrienoate | present | LOTUS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Acanthoscelides obtectus has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
The complete instruction manual Acanthoscelides obtectus carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
2n 206×GoaT · Animal Chromosome Counts Database · GoaT · Tree of Sex Database · GoaT · Coleoptera Karyotype Database +1
diploid1×GoaT · Coleoptera Karyotype Database
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
Record type1 038 records
Origin
Range
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Holding institutions13 of 39 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| DPIlocation not on record | 135 |
| Lexington, US | 44 |
| Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record | 37 |
| Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record | 24 |
| Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria - AGROSAVIAlocation not on record | 22 |
| Museums Victorialocation not on record | 18 |
| Australian National Fish Collectionlocation not on record | 15 |
| SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record | 14 |
| Natural History Museum of Utahlocation not on record | 14 |
| NHMOlocation not on record | 14 |
| Helsinki, FI | 13 |
| Provincia di Livornolocation not on record | 12 |
| Cape Town, ZA | 11 |
| OSUClocation not on record | 10 |
| East Lansing, US | 10 |
| MZLUlocation not on record | 9 |
| Lubbock, US | 8 |
| NTNU-VMlocation not on record | 8 |
| Philadelphia, US | 7 |
| Tilburg, NL | 6 |
| Tartu, EE | 6 |
| Salzburg, AT | 5 |
| QVMAGlocation not on record | 4 |
| Kushiro City Museumlocation not on record | 3 |
| Mayagüez, PR | 3 |
| Laboratorium voor Microbiologie der Landbouwhogeschoollocation not on record | 3 |
| NMOKlocation not on record | 2 |
| Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record | 2 |
| Oulu, FI | 2 |
| Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record | 1 |
| Ugentlocation not on record | 1 |
| Albuquerque, US | 1 |
| NSMKlocation not on record | 1 |
| BioFokuslocation not on record | 1 |
| CUlocation not on record | 1 |
| MX | 1 |
| PUC-RSlocation not on record | 1 |
| Centro Nacional de Investigación Disciplinaria en Conservación y Mejoramiento de Ecosistemas Forestales, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agrícolas y Pecuariaslocation not on record | 1 |
| CBDClocation not on record | 1 |
Where the DNA of Acanthoscelides obtectus was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
Modelled climatemodelled
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.