Żełuczka zmienna – gatunek grzybów należący do rodziny tarczownicowatych (Parmeliaceae). Ze względu na współżycie z glonami zaliczany jest do porostów.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Xanthoparmelia stenophylla across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile3 classes
Depsides2
Depsidones1
Usnic acid and derivatives1
Documented compounds4 total
Compound
Class
Amount
Source
d-Usnic acid
present
LOTUS
Lecanoric Acid
present
LOTUS
Ramalic acid
present
LOTUS
Salazinic acid
present
LOTUS
05DNA & barcoding89 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Xanthoparmelia stenophylla has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens89
Marker genes2
eDNA detections89
Countries7
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type4 137 records
Wild obs. + sensor2 736
Museum / vouchered1 390
Other11
Origin
Native9
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO11 196 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy95% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 439≤1 km 744≤10 km 109>10 km 18
2 310 georeferenced · 426 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor2 736
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy56% within 1 km
≤100 m 183≤1 km 226≤10 km 282>10 km 38
729 georeferenced · 661 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 390
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 71 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Madison, US
221
Olocation not on record
206
St. Paul, US
201
LDlocation not on record
78
CJBGlocation not on record
62
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
62
UNITOlocation not on record
62
Durham, US
36
TSBlocation not on record
34
Chicago, US
29
Berlin, DE
24
Stockholm, SE
23
Salzburg, AT
17
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
17
Helsinki, FI
14
MeiseBGlocation not on record
14
GZUlocation not on record
12
Natural History and Science Museum of the University of PO-Lrto (MHNC-UP)location not on record
12
Philadelphia, US
10
Trondheim, NO
9
CLUlocation not on record
9
Bergen, NO
9
PRClocation not on record
8
ASUlocation not on record
7
Forssa, FI
7
Dhaka, BD
6
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
6
TROMlocation not on record
6
Bronx, US
6
Uppsala, SE
6
Madrid, ES
5
Tallinn, EE
4
Minia, EG
4
Wuzhou, CN
4
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
4
Porvoo, FI
4
BioFokuslocation not on record
4
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
4
Klostermuseum Disentislocation not on record
3
University of Gdansklocation not on record
3
Kuopio, FI
3
Göteborg, SE
3
Université Lavallocation not on record
3
European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy (EDIT)location not on record
3
Museo Achille Folettolocation not on record
3
Repubblica di San Marinolocation not on record
3
Paris, FR
3
Oulu, FI
2
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
2
ILLSlocation not on record
2
Turku, FI
2
San Sebastián, ES
2
US
2
Fort Hayslocation not on record
2
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
2
Oskarshamn, SE
2
Durham, US
1
Portland, US
1
Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Researchlocation not on record
1
Wlocation not on record
1
BClocation not on record
1
Boise, US
1
nbflocation not on record
1
Staatsarchiv Urilocation not on record
1
BDBClocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
1
Mlocation not on record
1
Morgantown, US
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Winterthur, CH
1
71 institutions · 1 306 of 1 390 vouchered records shown · 65 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA89 detections
Where the DNA of Xanthoparmelia stenophylla was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found89
Studies independent surveys1
Countries3
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 89 detections have coordinates
Open the map3 countries0
On exposed rock near the sea
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.5 °C 12.5–12.5
Seasonal swing summer↔winter27.0 °C
Max temp (day)18.4 °C
Min temp (night)8.20 °C
Precipitation79.6 mm/mo
Air humidity57.3 %
Moisture balance-38.4 mm/mo
Vapour deficit733 Pa
Wind speed5.80 m/s
Cloud cover36.7 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 21 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility4 137 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI89 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics89 specimens↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗