Variospora flavescens (auch Hepps Schönfleck) ist eine in mitteleuropäischen Kalkgebieten häufige epilithische Flechtenart aus der Familie der Teloschistaceae.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Variospora flavescens has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens5
Marker genes1
eDNA detections5
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS
fungal barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type22 236 records
Wild obs. + sensor21 947
Museum / vouchered268
Other21
Origin
Native3
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO44 436 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 11 101≤1 km 1 480≤10 km 8 757>10 km 33
21 371 georeferenced · 576 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor21 947
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy65% within 1 km
≤100 m 44≤1 km 67≤10 km 57>10 km 3
171 georeferenced · 97 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence268
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions11 of 24 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
TSBlocation not on record
80
BDBClocation not on record
55
Madison, US
21
Olocation not on record
16
Durham, US
15
San Sebastián, ES
14
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
9
MeiseBGlocation not on record
7
Bergen, NO
5
nbflocation not on record
4
Madrid, ES
4
UNITOlocation not on record
3
Museo di Storia Naturale di Venezia Giancarlo Ligabue | Natural History Museum of Venice Giancarlo Ligabuelocation not on record
2
CLUlocation not on record
2
Philadelphia, US
2
Berlin, DE
2
Bourges, FR
2
LDlocation not on record
2
UAclocation not on record
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
University of Oslo, Natural History Museumlocation not on record
1
Uppsala, SE
1
Tilburg, NL
1
Vitoria, ES
1
24 institutions · 251 of 268 vouchered records shown · 17 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA5 detections
Where the DNA of Variospora flavescens was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found5
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 5 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
paa sementfuger i fundamentet til fyret. Ovr…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median15.0 °C 15.0–15.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter12.2 °C
Max temp (day)16.2 °C
Min temp (night)13.5 °C
Precipitation138 mm/mo
Air humidity63.5 %
Moisture balance25.7 mm/mo
Vapour deficit624 Pa
Wind speed5.90 m/s
Cloud cover48.2 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
