Le charbon couvert de l'orge est une maladie fongique causée par un champignon basidiomycète, Ustilago hordei, qui affecte les cultures d'orge. Cette maladie, qui se transmet par les semences, est assez rare depuis que les semences sont traitées. La structure de l'épi contaminé est préservée, mais on note une réduction de la taille des chaumes. Cette maladie a une répartition cosmopolite et est plus commune que le charbon nu ou le faux charbon nu.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ustilago hordei has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
Marker genes1
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections209
Countries8
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS9
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT · NCBI
The complete instruction manualUstilago hordei carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size22 200 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Ustilago hordei0.02 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelComplete Genome
Completeness99.4% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 067 records
Wild obs. + sensor38
Museum / vouchered1 000
Other29
Origin
Native2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO2 552 km²
Depth
0–200 m sunlit1
200–1000 m twilight0
1–4 km midnight0
>4 km abyssal0
median 5 m · max 5 m · 1 record with depth
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy41% within 1 km
≤100 m 5≤1 km 8≤10 km 19
32 georeferenced · 6 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor38
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy11% within 1 km
≤100 m 1≤1 km 68≤10 km 391>10 km 145
605 georeferenced · 395 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 000
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions28 of 46 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
279
DPIlocation not on record
95
ILLSlocation not on record
74
Lincoln, US
46
Pullman, US
43
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
33
Madison, US
31
Uppsala, SE
30
Auckland, NZ
25
Chicago, US
16
Bronx, US
14
PHlocation not on record
12
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
12
Karlsruhe, DE
11
Helsinki, FI
10
Kensington, AU
10
St. Paul, US
9
FLASlocation not on record
9
Tartu, EE
8
Brown Universitylocation not on record
8
TENN-Flocation not on record
6
Champaign, US
5
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
4
Chapel Hill, US
4
BDBClocation not on record
3
Cincinnati, US
3
Grupo Actinomicetales Merida Facultad de Medicinalocation not on record
2
Institute of Botany of the Academy of Sciences of the Republic of Uzbekistanlocation not on record
2
Hobart, AU
2
CA
2
Görlitz, DE
2
Clemson, US
2
Canberra, AU
2
Toronto, CA
1
Stockholm, SE
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Stockholm, SE
1
Kuopio, FI
1
Kew, GB
1
Trondheim, NO
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Mlocation not on record
1
Baton Rouge, US
1
GZUlocation not on record
1
LDlocation not on record
1
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
1
46 institutions · 827 of 1 000 vouchered records shown · 172 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA209 detections
Where the DNA of Ustilago hordei was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found209
Studies independent surveys7
Countries8
Verifiable raw sequence linked1
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 209 detections have coordinates
Open the map8 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Measured at samplingin-field
Temperature18.0 °C 8.00–38.0
pH5.70 3.90–9.60
Conductivity71.0 µS/cm 10.0–933
Organic carbon1.73 % 0.04–5.90
Water content6.51 % 0.853–54.3
Nitrate-N5.00 mg/kg 0.5–162
Phosphorus8.00 mg/kg 2.00–133
Clay16.5 % 1.92–64.9
Sand69.1 % 17.1–98.1
Depth0 m 0–0.2
MarineSoilChromosolsTenosolsSodosolKandosolDermosolLatLon out of range
165 samples with on-site data · median with range · describes the sample, not the organism
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median17.0 °C 12.7–23.0
Seasonal swing summer↔winter10.9 °C
Max temp (day)19.9 °C 17.7–28.9
Min temp (night)12.1 °C 7.00–17.8
Precipitation29.6 mm/mo 17.9–80.8
Air humidity56.7 % 46.4–59.7
Moisture balance-66.8 mm/mo
Vapour deficit789 Pa 623–1,327
Wind speed3.90 m/s
Cloud cover20.4 % 9.70–37.8
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 209 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility1 066 records↗
OBISOcean Biodiversity Information System1 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI209 eDNA detections↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗