Ustilago esculenta
Henn. · speciesAt a glance
Sources12 archives
Databases and archives Ustilago esculenta's data was compiled from.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility94 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI48 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics48 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
LOTUSNatural Products (Wikidata)compounds↗
NPASSNat. Product Activity & Species Sourcecompounds↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GoaTGenomes on a Tree · Sangergenome & karyotype↗
Catalogue of LifeCOLtaxonomy↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.
Ustilago esculenta is a species of fungus in the Ustilaginaceae, a family of smut fungi. It is in the same genus as the fungi that cause corn smut, loose smut of barley, false loose smut, covered smut of barley, loose smut of oats, and other grass diseases. This species is pathogenic as well, attacking Manchurian wild rice (Zizania latifolia), also known as Manchurian ricegrass, Asian wild rice,Terrell, E. E. and L. R. Batra. (1982). Zizania latifolia and Ustilago esculenta, a grass-fungus association. Economic Botany 36(3) 274–85. and wateroat.Chen, R. and D. D. Tzeng. (1999). PCR-mediated detection of Ustilago esculenta in wateroat (Zizania latifolia) by ribosomal internal transcribed spacer sequences. Plant Pathology Bulletin 8 149–156. This grass is its only known host.Chung, K. and D. D. Tzeng. (2004). Nutritional requirements of the edible gall-producing fungus Ustilago esculenta. Journal of Biological Sciences 4(2) 246–52. Zizania latifolia is grown as an agricultural crop across Asia. The success of the crop depends on the smut fungus. The grass is not grown for its grain, as are other wild rice species, but for the stems, which swell into juicy galls when infected with the smut. The galled stems are harvested as a vegetable called gau-soon and kal-peh-soonChung, K. R. and D. D. Tzeng. (2004). Biosynthesis of indole-3-acetic acid by the gall-inducing fungus Ustilago esculenta. Journal of Biological Sciences 4(6) 744–50. (also, gau sun and kah peh sung) and jiaobai in China.Jing-Ze, Z., et al. (2012). Cytology and ultrastructure of interactions between Ustilago esculenta and Zizania latifolia. Mycological Progress 11(2) 499–508. Its Japanese name is makomotake.Kawagishi, H., et al. (2006). Osteoclast-forming suppressive compounds from makomotake, Zizania latifolia infected with Ustilago esculenta. Bioscience, Biotechnology, and Biochemistry 70(11) 2800-02. The galled section of the stem is 3 to wide and up to 20 cm long. This vegetable has been grown for centuries in China, at least 400 years.Oritani, Y., et al. Manchurian wild rice (Zizania latifolia) infected with Ustilago esculenta stimulates innate immune system, via induction of human β-defensin-2. ISHS Acta Horticulturae 841: II International Symposium on Human Health Effects of Fruits and Vegetables: FAVHEALTH 2007. It is popular for its flavor and tender texture.You, W., et al. (2011). Morphological and molecular differences in two strains of Ustilago esculenta. Current Microbiology 62 44–54. Its taste resembles fresh bamboo shoots. It is eaten raw or cooked. It stays crisp when stir-fried.Yamaguchi, M. 1990. Asian Vegetables. pp. 387–390. In: Janick, J. and J. E. Simon, Eds. Advances in New Crops. Timber Press, Portland, OR. The main harvesting season is between September and November. This is also typhoon season in parts of Asia, a time when many other vegetables are unavailable. This makes the product more attractive to consumers. When the fungus invades the host plant it causes it to hypertrophy, its cells increasing in size and number. The fungus destroys the flowering structures of the plant, so it does not make seed. The crop is propagated asexually, by rhizome. New sprouts are infected by spores in the environment, which is generally a paddy. The fungus can also be transmitted directly in the rhizome. If conditions such as temperature are off, the stem becomes filled with dark-colored, sand-like fungal spores instead of swelling into a vegetable, ruining the crop. Also, there are two known strains of the fungus. One causes the swelling of the stem tissues which produces the vegetable, but the other does not; instead, it fills the stem with spores. Besides food, the smut-infested stems of the plant have been used medicinally in the treatment of hypertension and heart disease. The spores themselves are used in art. They serve as pigment in Japanese lacquerware, where their brownish color produces a rusty tone to the work. There is a case report of a lacquerware artist who developed hypersensitivity pneumonitis after dusting her work with the spores and then blowing off the excess.Yoshida, K., et al. (1996). Hypersensitivity pneumonitis induced by a smut fungus Ustilago esculenta. Thorax 51 650–51. This fungus is federally regulated in the United States. It is thought to pose a threat to North American wild rice. As it prevents the flowering and seed-producing ability of Asian wild rice, it is feared that it could halt grain production if it successfully attacked the local wild rice species. Despite quarantines, a small plot of smut-infested Z. latifolia was discovered growing near Modesto, California, in 1991, and it was destroyed to prevent its spread.Watson, T., et al. (1991). Disease Note: Smut of Manchurian wild rice caused by Ustilago esculenta in California. Plant Dis. 75 1075.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
No structured trait data for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Ustilago esculenta across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Documented compounds34 total
| Compound | Class | Amount | Source |
|---|---|---|---|
| (1S,2R,3R,4R,10R,11R)-4-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-3,11-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)hexacyclo[8.7.6.12,5.012,17.018,23.09,24]tetracosa-5(24),6,8,12(17),13,15,18(23),19,21-nonaene-6,8,14,19,21-pentol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2R,3R,9R,10R,17S)-3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaene-5,13,15-triol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2R,3R,9S,10S,17S)-3-[(2S,3S)-3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxy-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-4-yl]-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaene-5,13,15-triol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2R,3R,9S,10S,17S)-3-[(2S,3S)-6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-[3-hydroxy-5-[(2S,3R,4S,5S,6R)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyphenyl]-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-4-yl]-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaene-5,13,15-triol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,2S,3S,9R,10R,17R)-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-3-[3-hydroxy-5-[(2R,3S,4R,5R,6S)-3,4,5-trihydroxy-6-(hydroxymethyl)oxan-2-yl]oxyphenyl]-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaene-5,13,15-triol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,4R,5R,11R,12R,15R,16R,22S)-4,15-bis(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,11,16,22-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6,17-dioxahexacyclo[10.9.1.02,10.03,7.013,21.014,18]docosa-2(10),3(7),8,13(21),14(18),19-hexaene-9,20-diol | present | NPASS | |
| (1S,4R,5R,11R,12R,15R,16S,22S)-4,15-bis(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,11,16,22-tetrakis(4-hydroxyphenyl)-6,17-dioxahexacyclo[10.9.1.02,10.03,7.013,21.014,18]docosa-2(10),3(7),8,13(21),14(18),19-hexaene-9,20-diol | present | NPASS | |
| (2R,9S,10S,11S,12S)-12-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-[(R)-[(1S,2R,3R,9S,10S,17S)-3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-5,13,15-trihydroxy-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaen-6-yl]-(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-9,11-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)tetracyclo[8.6.1.03,8.013,17]heptadeca-1(16),3(8),4,6,13(17),14-hexaene-5,7,14,16-tetrol | present | NPASS | |
| (2R,9S,10S,11S,12S)-12-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-[(R)-[(1S,2R,3R,9S,10S,17S)-3-[(2R,3R)-3-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-6-hydroxy-2-(4-hydroxyphenyl)-2,3-dihydro-1-benzofuran-4-yl]-5,13,15-trihydroxy-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaen-6-yl]-(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-9,11-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)tetracyclo[8.6.1.03,8.013,17]heptadeca-1(16),3(8),4,6,13(17),14-hexaene-5,7,14,16-tetrol | present | NPASS | |
| (2R,9S,10S,11S,12S)-12-(3,5-dihydroxyphenyl)-2-[(R)-[2,6-dihydroxy-4-[(1S,2R,3R,9S,10S,17S)-5,13,15-trihydroxy-2,9,17-tris(4-hydroxyphenyl)-8-oxapentacyclo[8.7.2.04,18.07,19.011,16]nonadeca-4(18),5,7(19),11(16),12,14-hexaen-3-yl]phenyl]-(4-hydroxyphenyl)methyl]-9,11-bis(4-hydroxyphenyl)tetracyclo[8.6.1.03,8.013,17]heptadeca-1(16),3(8),4,6,13(17),14-hexaene-5,7,14,16-tetrol | present | NPASS |
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Ustilago esculenta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
The complete instruction manual Ustilago esculenta carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Record type94 records
Range
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Holding institutions10 of 16 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
| Institution | Specimens |
|---|---|
| Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record | 10 |
| Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record | 4 |
| Bronx, US | 2 |
| Görlitz, DE | 2 |
| TENN-Flocation not on record | 2 |
| Pullman, US | 2 |
| Stockholm, SE | 2 |
| CA | 2 |
| Kew, GB | 2 |
| MeiseBGlocation not on record | 2 |
| Madison, US | 2 |
| DPIlocation not on record | 2 |
| Chapel Hill, US | 1 |
| Auckland, NZ | 1 |
| National Museum of Natural Sciencelocation not on record | 1 |
| Karlsruhe, DE | 1 |
Where the DNA of Ustilago esculenta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Where its DNA was found
How strong is each trace?
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.