Habitat GIFTÁrea Antrópica, Caatinga (stricto sensu), Campo Limpo, Floresta Ombrófila (= Floresta Pluvial), Restinga, Savana Amazônica, Vegetação Sobre Afloramentos Rochosos
Woodinessnon-woody
05DNA & barcoding4 specimens
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Turnera scabra has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens4
Marker genes2
eDNA detections4
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS2
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT · TreeOfSex
The complete instruction manualTurnera scabra carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · croinout — Shore, J. S. & Barrett, S. C. H. 1985
CCDB · croinout — Barrett, S. C. H. & Shore, J. S. 1987
CCDB · croinout — Shore, J. S. 1991
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Ferńandez, A. & M. M. Arbo. 1989. Relaciones genómicas entre cuatro especies diploides de Turnera con flores amarillo (serie Canaligerae). Bonplandia (Corrientes) 6: 93–102.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Solis Neffa, V. G. & A. Fernandez. 1993. Estudios cromosómicos en especies de Turnera (Turneraceae). Bonplandia (Corrientes) 7: 101–118.
CCDB · ipcn-api-dl — Solis Neffa, V. G. 1996. Cariotipos de especies de Turnera (Turneraceae). Bonplandia (Corrientes) 9(1–2): 121–127.
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy75% within 1 km
≤100 m 10≤1 km 5≤10 km 3>10 km 2
20 georeferenced · 13 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor33
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy67% within 1 km
≤100 m 7≤1 km 1≤10 km 3>10 km 1
12 georeferenced · 644 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence656
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions25 of 66 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Saint Louis, US
238
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
106
Antiguo Cuscatlán, SV
30
Bronx, US
29
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
28
Chicago, US
19
León, NI
18
Berlin, DE
15
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
14
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Nortelocation not on record
13
Altos de Pipe, VE
11
San José, CR
11
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
8
Salvador, BR
7
Kew, GB
6
Universidade Federal do Ceara, Departamento de Biologialocation not on record
6
Instituto de Investigación de Recursos Biológicos Alexander von Humboldt (IAvH)location not on record
5
Corrientes, AR
5
MAlocation not on record
4
UFBAlocation not on record
4
Laboratorio de Ictiologialocation not on record
4
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
3
Fortaleza, BR
3
Sangmiung Universitylocation not on record
3
BMlocation not on record
3
Calabar, NG
3
Empresa Pernambucana de Pesquisa Agropecuária, IPAlocation not on record
3
UNICAMPlocation not on record
2
Universidad Nacional Agrarialocation not on record
2
Tampa, US
2
Universidade Federal do Maranhãolocation not on record
2
UFPElocation not on record
2
Edinburgh, GB
2
UFERSAlocation not on record
2
UFPRlocation not on record
2
Cambridge, US
2
Feira de Santana, BR
1
UFRPElocation not on record
1
JBRJlocation not on record
1
Miami, US
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Universidade Federal de Sergipe (UFS)location not on record
1
Uberlândia, BR
1
CEPLAClocation not on record
1
Londrina, BR
1
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
1
University of Guyanalocation not on record
1
QCNElocation not on record
1
Plocation not on record
1
Universidad de El Salvadorlocation not on record
1
Masindi, UG
1
IAvHlocation not on record
1
LGlocation not on record
1
FPMZBlocation not on record
1
Brasília, BR
1
Guatemala City, GT
1
UEMAlocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
Universidad de los Llanos (UniLlanos)location not on record
1
Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldilocation not on record
1
UTFPR-CPlocation not on record
1
Campo Mourão, BR
1
UNIVASFlocation not on record
1
UFSClocation not on record
1
Ural Federal University "B. N. Yeltsin"location not on record
1
Universidade Federal de Santa Catarinalocation not on record
1
66 institutions · 647 of 656 vouchered records shown · 9 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA4 detections
Where the DNA of Turnera scabra was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found4
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 4 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.