Trypodendron domesticum is a species of weevil native to Europe.Fauna EuropaeaFreude, H., Harde, K.W., & Lohse, G.A. (eds, 1981, 1983) Die Käfer Mitteleuropas. Band 10. Bruchidae, Anthribidae, Scolytidae, Platypodidae, Curculionidae. Band 11. Curculionidae II. Krefeld: Goecke & Evers.Hoffmann, A. (1950, 1954, 1958) Coléoptères curculionides. Parties I, II, III. Paris: Éditions Faune de France. Bibliothèque virtuelle numérique pdfs
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Trypodendron domesticum has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens226
BINs1
Marker genes2
eDNA detections814
Countries11
The DNA barcodethe species' typical barcode, built from every sequenced specimen
COI-5P655 bp consensus218 specimens
ACGT
▸ drag or hover over the strip to read any position — letter and how much it varies
Violet ticks below the strip = positions where individuals differ; flat = the species' unchanging signature. 100% of positions are identical in every specimen.
Where individuals differ — all 2 variable positions, in barcode order
Each circle is a barcode variant; bigger = more specimens, colour = region. Lines join the most similar variants and the tick marks count the mutations between them — a tight cluster is one “dialect”, a long line a more divergent lineage. Click a circle to list its actual specimens.
Diversity (π)0.19%
Haplotypes21
BIN1
Most divergent pair0.92%
EuropeN.America
Closest relatives by DNA barcode
The species whose COI barcode is most similar to this one — a quick “who is this most like”. The percentage is how much the barcode differs; it approximates, but is not, the full evolutionary tree.
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★COI-5P28S-D2
animal barcodemarker
Organelle genome
Besides the big genome in the nucleus, cells carry a small, circular loop of DNA inside the cell's energy factories — the mitochondria. It is inherited almost only from the mother and is a leftover from ancient bacteria that moved into the cell. The mitochondrial markers above (ND*, COX, CYTB…) are read from exactly this loop. Outer ring = one strand, inner ring = the other.
▸ Tap any coloured segment — or a gene chip — to see what it is
◖ violet arc = the COI-5P barcode — the ~650 bp read used to ID this species
Pick a coloured segment on the ring — or a gene chip — to read what that gene does.
protein-codingrRNAtRNA
07Deep time~9.71 Ma lineage
How far back this lineage goes — and how we know. Everything here is measured in Ma, short for “mega-annum”: millions of years ago. The chart reads left to right like a calendar of the Earth, from the deep past on the left to today at the right edgetop to bottom like a core drilled through the Earth, from the deep past at the top down to today at the bottom.
At a glance
DNA clock origin9.71 Ma TimeTree
When this lineage existed
How to read this: the coloured strip along the bottomdown the left is the geological calendar — the standard epochs (Pliocene, Pleistocene…) every museum uses, shown so you can see which chapter of Earth's history this lineage lived in. This lineage is a young one, so the strip is zoomed in to epochs — the finer subdivisions inside a period. The orange marker is the DNA clock: DNA accumulates mutations at a roughly steady rate, so comparing this species' DNA with its relatives estimates when the lineage split off — independently of any fossil.
DNA clock origin
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type14 915 records
Wild obs. + sensor9 786
Museum / vouchered2 069
Other3 060
Origin
Native608
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO10 892 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy32% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 526≤1 km 672≤10 km 4 656>10 km 44
6 898 georeferenced · 2 888 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor9 786
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy57% within 1 km
≤100 m 399≤1 km 449≤10 km 586>10 km 46
1 480 georeferenced · 589 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 069
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions22 of 54 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Tartu, EE
256
NMBU:MINAlocation not on record
139
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
116
Brussels, BE
86
Trondheim, NO
84
Museum of Zoology at the University of Bergen, Invertebrate Collectionlocation not on record
73
Geneva, CH
58
Jyväskylä, FI
55
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
54
Olocation not on record
46
NHMOlocation not on record
33
Fribourg, CH
30
Helsinki, FI
29
Bern, CH
25
Naturéum — Muséum cantonal des sciences naturelles, Lausanne, Département Zoologielocation not on record
22
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
20
Zürich, CH
19
Tromsø, NO
15
MZLUlocation not on record
15
Metsähallituslocation not on record
15
Naturmuseum St. Gallenlocation not on record
12
Muzeum Górnośląskie w Bytomiulocation not on record
10
CBDClocation not on record
9
NMOKlocation not on record
9
WULS-DFPElocation not on record
9
Philadelphia, US
8
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
7
Oulu, FI
6
Tallinn, EE
6
Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU)location not on record
6
Frauenfeld, CH
6
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
5
Dhaka, BD
4
BioFokuslocation not on record
4
Paro, BT
4
Winterthur, CH
4
Kuopio, FI
4
Muzeum i Instytut Zoologii Polskiej Akademii Nauklocation not on record
4
Natural History Museum Rotterdamlocation not on record
3
neflocation not on record
3
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Museo civico Brancaleoni di Piobbicolocation not on record
2
NTNU-VMlocation not on record
2
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
2
ZMAAlocation not on record
2
Tilburg, NL
1
Natural History Museum, Londonlocation not on record
1
University Museum of Bergen, Natural History Collectionslocation not on record
1
Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiejlocation not on record
1
MFUlocation not on record
1
Wellcome Sanger Institutelocation not on record
1
University of Guelph, Centre for Biodiversity Genomicslocation not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
54 institutions · 1 333 of 2 069 vouchered records shown · 736 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA814 detections
Where the DNA of Trypodendron domesticum was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found814
Studies independent surveys4
Countries11
Verifiable raw sequence linked601
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median2.80 °C 0.9–6.50
Seasonal swing summer↔winter16.9 °C
Max temp (day)5.40 °C 3.70–10.2
Min temp (night)-0.2 °C -2.20–3.20
Precipitation47.8 mm/mo 36.0–95.5
Air humidity64.7 % 59.8–65.3
Moisture balance3.90 mm/mo -28.3–54.2
Vapour deficit265 Pa 226–372
Wind speed4.40 m/s 2.90–5.30
Cloud cover50.5 % 45.1–62.0
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 812 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.