Tropidocarpum gracile is a species of flowering plant in the family Brassicaceae known by the common name dobie pod. It is native to California and Baja California, where it can be found in many types of habitat from coastal canyons to inland mountains and deserts in chaparral, scrub, woodlands, beaches, valleys, and washes. It is an annual herb producing a decumbent to erect, spreading, branching stem 10 to 50 centimeters in length. It is coated in short and long rough hairs. The basal leaves are up to 10 to 15 centimeters long and are divided into elongated lobes along the edges; leaves higher on the stem are shorter and sometimes less divided. The inflorescence is an open raceme of mustardlike flowers with four petals each about 4 millimeters long. The petals are yellow and sometimes purple-tinged. The fruit is a narrow silique several centimeters in length containing tiny brown seeds.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Tropidocarpum gracile has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes2
eDNA detections2
Countries1
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcLa★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB
The complete instruction manualTropidocarpum gracile carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
Chromosomes2n = 16 n = 8
Chromosome-count records — grouped by value · 2n = full set, n = gamete · click a value for sources & references
2n 161×CCDB · eflora
CCDB · eflora
n 83×CCDB · book-ipcn66 · CCDB · brass
CCDB · book-ipcn66 — Rollins 1966
CCDB · brass — Rollins
CCDB · brass — Rollins & Rdenberg
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type1 376 records
Wild obs. + sensor481
Museum / vouchered895
Origin
Native133
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO3 684 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy94% within 1 km
≤100 m 275≤1 km 45≤10 km 10>10 km 9
339 georeferenced · 142 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor481
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy47% within 1 km
≤100 m 37≤1 km 181≤10 km 232>10 km 14
464 georeferenced · 431 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence895
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions33 of 43 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Claremont, US
183
Riverside, US
104
San Diego, US
80
Santa Barbara, US
71
Davis, US
38
San Luis Obispo, US
37
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
33
CASlocation not on record
29
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
18
US
14
Long Beach, US
9
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
8
Los Angeles, US
7
EL PASO, US
7
Northridge, US
7
Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record
7
Provo, US
7
Fullerton, US
6
Arcata, US
6
Bronx, US
5
Irvine, US
5
Philadelphia, US
4
San Jose, US
4
ASUlocation not on record
4
Santa Cruz, US
3
Angwin, US
3
San Francisco, US
2
Saint Louis, US
2
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
2
Phoenix, US
2
Bloomington, US
2
Tampa, US
1
Denver, US
1
Mississippi State, US
1
Pullman, US
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
1
Logan, US
1
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
Hermosillo, MX
1
Pomona Collegelocation not on record
1
San Bernardino, US
1
43 institutions · 721 of 895 vouchered records shown · 173 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Tropidocarpum gracile was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
Rocky sandy soil
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median13.9 °C 12.8–15.1
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.8 °C
Max temp (day)20.1 °C 18.8–21.4
Min temp (night)8.60 °C 8.30–8.90
Precipitation59.8 mm/mo 44.0–75.7
Air humidity52.5 % 48.6–56.4
Moisture balance-56.9 mm/mo -71.7–-42.1
Vapour deficit829 Pa 752–905
Wind speed4.50 m/s 3.40–5.50
Cloud cover36.3 % 36.1–36.6
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.