Trifolium willdenovii là một loài thực vật thuộc họ Fabaceae. Loài này mọc ở nửa phía tây của Bắc Mỹ. Nó được tìm thấy ở California Coast Ranges ở các địa phương như Ring Mountain, California, nơi nó được phát hiện liên hệ với Cup clover.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
Compounds documented for Trifolium willdenovii across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Trifolium willdenovii has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens16
Marker genes5
GenBank sequences10
eDNA detections9
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Trifolium willdenovii bio-material R. Morgan personal collection W14 from USA small subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence; internal transcribed spacer 1, 5.8S ribosomal RNA gene, and internal transcribed spacer 2, complete sequence; and large subunit ribosomal RNA gene, partial sequence
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK★rbcL★rbcLa★ITS10★ITS2
plant barcodefungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceCCDB · GoaT
The complete instruction manualTrifolium willdenovii carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size433 254 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
THIS GENOME Trifolium willdenovii0.43 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Chromosomes & ploidyhow the DNA is packaged
2n is the full chromosome count in a normal body cell; n is a gamete (egg or sperm), which carries half. Ploidy is how many complete chromosome sets each cell holds — 2× (diploid) is typical for animals, while higher levels (polyploidy) are common in plants. Click any value below to see the underlying records and sources.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — PRITCHARD, A.J. 1969. Chromosome numbers in some species of Trifoli Austral. J. Agric. Res. 20: 883-887.
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — GILLETT, J.M., & T. MOSQUIN. 1967. In IOPB chromosome number reports x. Taxon 16: 146-157.
CCDB · kew — Vižintin L, Javornik B, Bohanec B. 2006. Genetic characterization of selected Trifolium species as revealed by nuclear DNA content and ITS rDNA region analysis. Plant Science 170: 859-866.
n 81×CCDB · book-ipcn67-71
CCDB · book-ipcn67-71 — GILLETT, J.M., & T. MOSQUIN. 1967. In IOPB chromosome number reports x. Taxon 16: 146-157.
Ploidy records — measured levels and diploid/polyploid inferences · click for sources
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy91% within 1 km
≤100 m 5 049≤1 km 660≤10 km 271>10 km 265
6 245 georeferenced · 2 135 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor8 380
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy59% within 1 km
≤100 m 93≤1 km 724≤10 km 523>10 km 38
1 378 georeferenced · 1 361 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 739
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions51 of 78 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Santa Barbara, US
289
Claremont, US
280
Riverside, US
236
San Diego, US
209
Davis, US
171
DOI/NPS, Little Rock Central High School National Historic Sitelocation not on record
115
Santa Cruz, US
109
San Luis Obispo, US
106
Corvallis, US
105
Victoria, CA
73
Arcata, US
69
Pullman, US
69
ASUlocation not on record
56
Canadian Department of Agriculturelocation not on record
46
US
43
Severin-McDaniel Insect Collectionlocation not on record
28
LDlocation not on record
26
WTUlocation not on record
25
Irvine, US
24
Los Angeles, US
19
Turlock, US
17
Catalina Island Conservancylocation not on record
13
Northridge, US
12
Portland, US
12
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
12
Bloomington, US
11
San Jose, US
10
San Francisco, US
10
Vancouver, CA
10
CASlocation not on record
10
Flagstaff, US
9
Philadelphia, US
9
Boise, US
7
Fredericton Stock Culture Collectionlocation not on record
6
Ashland, US
6
Phoenix, US
5
Bronx, US
5
Long Beach, US
5
University of British Columbia, Herbariumlocation not on record
4
Provo, US
4
EL PASO, US
4
Saint Louis, US
4
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
3
Henderson, US
3
Moscow, US
3
Logan, US
3
Bureau of Land Management, Medford District Officelocation not on record
3
South Kensington, GB
2
Tacoma, US
2
DOI/NPS, Greenbelt Parklocation not on record
2
Macomb, US
2
Kew, GB
2
Ensenada, MX
2
Chadron, US
2
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
Meguro Parasitological Museumlocation not on record
1
Montréal, CA
1
Frankfurt am Main
1
Mexico City, MX
1
Minia, EG
1
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
1
Pittsburg, US
1
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
1
Giardini Botanici Hanburylocation not on record
1
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
1
STNFlocation not on record
1
MAlocation not on record
1
Austin, US
1
Calabar, NG
1
Arizona State University Biocollectionslocation not on record
1
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
1
Bend, US
1
New Brunswick, US
1
Chicago, US
1
Wlocation not on record
1
Beijing, CN
1
BAYLUlocation not on record
1
San Diego Natural History Museum, Herbariumlocation not on record
1
78 institutions · 2 336 of 2 739 vouchered records shown · 403 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA9 detections
Where the DNA of Trifolium willdenovii was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found9
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 9 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
On upper open rocky slopes on N S and W expo…
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median14.6 °C 11.7–16.3
Seasonal swing summer↔winter13.1 °C
Max temp (day)17.1 °C 14.3–22.8
Min temp (night)11.1 °C 9.60–12.0
Precipitation54.0 mm/mo 19.8–83.3
Air humidity60.2 % 57.8–61.1
Moisture balance-51.1 mm/mo
Vapour deficit657 Pa 549–771
Wind speed2.00 m/s
Cloud cover43.2 % 30.5–45.3
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 5 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.