A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Trametes hirsuta has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens101
Marker genes3
eDNA detections224
Countries19
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★ITS★ITS1★ITS2
fungal barcode
06Genome at a glanceGoaT
The complete instruction manualTrametes hirsuta carries — its genome. We read it from three angles — how big it is, how the DNA is packed into chromosomes, and how completely it has been sequenced — and explain how to read each value as you go.
Genome sizehow big the whole instruction manual is
Genome size37 430 000 bp
Measured in base pairs (bp) — the individual letters of DNA (human ≈ 3.2 Gb, a bacterium a few million). The chart places this genome on a logarithmic scale — each step to the right is ten times bigger — among reference organisms. Across species a bigger genome loosely tracks with larger cells, slower growth and lower-energy lifestyles (powered flight favours small genomes) — yet it does not imply more genes or a more advanced organism (the long-standing C-value paradox).
BACTERIUM Carsonella ruddii0.00016 Gb
THIS GENOME Trametes hirsuta0.04 Gb
FUNGUS0.04 Gb
INSECT0.25 Gb
HUMAN3.2 Gb
WHEAT17 Gb
FERN Tmesipteris160.45 Gb
Sequencing statusassembly quality — how far to trust these numbers
Assembly level tells you how finished the sequence is — from fragmented contigs, through scaffolds, up to a full chromosome-level assembly. BUSCO % estimates completeness: the share of genes expected to be present that were actually found. These describe the data quality, not the organism.
Assembly levelChromosome
Completeness96.9% BUSCO
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type17 701 records
Wild obs. + sensor15 482
Museum / vouchered2 185
Cultivated / captive2
Other32
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO41 560 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy65% within 1 km
≤100 m 6 289≤1 km 2 475≤10 km 4 340>10 km 286
13 390 georeferenced · 2 092 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor15 482
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy54% within 1 km
≤100 m 209≤1 km 458≤10 km 472>10 km 98
1 237 georeferenced · 948 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 185
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy
no georeferenced coordinates · 2 records without
Open the mapnot free-living2
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions46 of 97 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Olocation not on record
375
Bronx, US
207
Museo Entomologico de Leonlocation not on record
177
GJOlocation not on record
99
Uppsala, SE
93
Görlitz, DE
87
San Sebastián, ES
68
TROMlocation not on record
56
Toronto, CA
53
Joensuu, FI
51
Karlsruhe, DE
49
Cincinnati, US
45
Mexico City, MX
44
Brisbane, AU
44
DPIlocation not on record
31
Trondheim, NO
27
Jyväskylä, FI
27
St. Paul, US
24
LDlocation not on record
21
TENN-Flocation not on record
19
Université de Montréal Biodiversity Centrelocation not on record
16
Uniwersytet Łódzkilocation not on record
16
Göteborg, SE
15
Tomioka, JP
14
Kew, GB
14
Odawara, JP
12
Canberra, AU
12
Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Moreloslocation not on record
12
WU-MYClocation not on record
12
Zapopan, MX
11
BDBClocation not on record
10
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
10
Kathmandu, NP
9
Department of Plant Resources, National Herbarium and Plant Laboratorieslocation not on record
7
Beltsville, US
6
Mlocation not on record
6
McWane Science Centerlocation not on record
6
UJEDlocation not on record
6
Copenhagen, DK
5
Bardejov, SK
5
Warsaw, PL
5
Natural History Museum, Tribhuvan Universitylocation not on record
5
Centro de Estudios Superiores del Estado de Sonoralocation not on record
5
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record
5
nsnflocation not on record
4
Vancouver, CA
4
Denver, US
4
University of Tennessee at Chattanoogalocation not on record
4
Staten Island, US
4
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
4
Oskarshamn, SE
4
University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)location not on record
4
Bernard Price Institute for Palaeontological Researchlocation not on record
4
Osaka, JP
3
BRNUlocation not on record
3
Universidade de Lisboa, Museu Bocagelocation not on record
3
Logan, US
3
National Museum of Natural Sciencelocation not on record
3
Durango, MX
3
Acadia Universitylocation not on record
3
National Mushroom Centre, Department of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock, Bhutanlocation not on record
2
Durham, US
2
Fungario QCAM de la Pontificia Universidad Católica del Ecuadorlocation not on record
2
FLASlocation not on record
2
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
2
Hobart, AU
2
Davis and Elkins Collegelocation not on record
2
IMBIVlocation not on record
2
Kensington, AU
2
Winterthur, CH
2
Parkville, AU
1
Santa Cruz, US
1
Smithfield, AU
1
PUC-RSlocation not on record
1
Clemson, US
1
Ciudad de México, MX
1
NSW Dept of Planning, Industry and Environmentlocation not on record
1
Mérida, ES
1
California State University, East Baylocation not on record
1
Bando, JP
1
Gujarat Biodiversity Gene Banklocation not on record
1
Youngstown State Universitylocation not on record
1
Fort Hayslocation not on record
1
The University of Arizonalocation not on record
1
University of Warsawlocation not on record
1
Instituto Tecnológico de Ciudad Victorialocation not on record
1
ILLSlocation not on record
1
Córdoba, AR
1
Pullman, US
1
CA
1
BioFokuslocation not on record
1
Ann Arbor, US
1
Personal Herbarium of Bitty Roylocation not on record
1
Private Collection of Jessica Rosslocation not on record
1
Senckenberg Gesellschaft für Naturforschung: Senckenberg Forschungsinstitut und Naturmuseumlocation not on record
1
PHlocation not on record
1
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznańlocation not on record
1
97 institutions · 1 925 of 2 185 vouchered records shown · 255 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA224 detections
Where the DNA of Trametes hirsuta was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found224
Studies independent surveys3
Countries19
Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median12.8 °C 5.00–17.8
Seasonal swing summer↔winter20.0 °C
Max temp (day)16.9 °C 9.40–21.8
Min temp (night)7.50 °C 0–13.8
Precipitation93.8 mm/mo 54.8–175
Air humidity58.8 % 56.5–62.4
Moisture balance-2.00 mm/mo -50.9–58.7
Vapour deficit589 Pa 367–851
Wind speed3.00 m/s 2.10–3.80
Cloud cover39.1 % 33.4–49.5
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 141 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.