Tayloria lingulata, commonly known as lingulate dung moss, tongue-leaved gland-moss, or marsh collar-moss, is a moss found in montane habitats in the Northern Hemisphere including Europe, Asia and North America. In the United Kingdom, it occurs only in Scotland where it has been found on Ben Lawers and Ben Lomond."Moss Species Action Plan US8" (2001) (pdf) Stirling Council. Retrieved 16 May 2008."Report on the Species and Habitat Review" (June 2007) (pdf) BAP. Retrieved 5 July 2008."Species & Habitat Detail: Tayloria lingulata" Biodiversity Scotland. Retrieved 5 July 2008.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Tayloria lingulata has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens3
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences1
eDNA detections2
Countries1
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★rbcL1★rbcLa★trnL-F
plant barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 058 records
Wild obs. + sensor760
Museum / vouchered1 297
Other1
Origin
Native35
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 520 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy85% within 1 km
≤100 m 471≤1 km 146≤10 km 106>10 km 1
724 georeferenced · 36 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor760
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy49% within 1 km
≤100 m 236≤1 km 154≤10 km 217>10 km 185
792 georeferenced · 505 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence1 297
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions41 of 75 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Trondheim, NO
265
Oulu, FI
120
LDlocation not on record
97
Uppsala, SE
92
South Kensington, GB
58
Polar-Alpine Botanical Garden-Institutelocation not on record
46
Garðabær, IS
42
Museo civico La Terra e l'Uomo di Crocetta del Montellolocation not on record
40
Vancouver, CA
36
Olocation not on record
33
Stockholm, SE
32
Bronx, US
31
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
30
Metsähallituslocation not on record
24
Knoxville, US
19
Moscow State Universitylocation not on record
18
Durham, US
15
DOI/NPS, Colonial National Historical Parklocation not on record
13
Turku, FI
10
TROMlocation not on record
10
Saint Louis, US
10
Université Lavallocation not on record
9
Frankfurt am Main
9
WTUlocation not on record
9
CASlocation not on record
8
Salzburg, AT
8
Madison, US
7
Oskarshamn, SE
7
Kuopio, FI
7
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
6
Lausanne, CH
6
Ann Arbor, US
6
BRNUlocation not on record
5
Bourges, FR
5
GBS RAN - Glavny Botanichesky Sad Rossijskoj Akademii Nauklocation not on record
5
Edmonton, CA
5
Philadelphia, US
5
Göteborg, SE
5
Jyväskylä, FI
4
CJBGlocation not on record
4
Helsinki, FI
4
Museo civico di Storia naturale Giacomo Doria di Genova | Giacomo Doria Natural History Museum in Genoalocation not on record
4
MAlocation not on record
4
Slovak National Museumlocation not on record
4
SZUlocation not on record
4
Montréal, CA
3
Uniwersytet Wrocławskilocation not on record
3
3
BioFokuslocation not on record
3
Umeå Universitylocation not on record
3
Cincinnati, US
3
Société québécoise de bryologie (SQB)location not on record
3
Yugra State University Biological Collectionlocation not on record
3
US
3
Zürich, CH
3
Tallinn, EE
2
PHlocation not on record
2
Paris, FR
2
Dresden, DE
2
Tartu, EE
2
Institute of the Industrial Ecology Problems of the North of Kola Science Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences.location not on record
2
Museum Ludovicae Ulricae, Zoology Institute of the University of Uppsalalocation not on record
2
Uniwersytet Warszawskilocation not on record
1
Henderson, US
1
St. Paul, US
1
Missoula, US
1
Naturkundliche Sammlung Urilocation not on record
1
New Brunswick, US
1
Denver, US
1
New Haven, US
1
Jiangxi College of Educationlocation not on record
1
kunlocation not on record
1
Tromso University Museumlocation not on record
1
Madrid, ES
1
State Museum of Natural History of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukrainelocation not on record
1
75 institutions · 1 238 of 1 297 vouchered records shown · 59 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA2 detections
Where the DNA of Tayloria lingulata was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found2
Studies independent surveys1
Countries1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 2 detections have coordinates
Open the map1 country0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median8.10 °C 8.10–8.10
Seasonal swing summer↔winter22.9 °C
Max temp (day)9.20 °C
Min temp (night)4.40 °C
Precipitation140 mm/mo
Air humidity64.4 %
Moisture balance108 mm/mo
Vapour deficit385 Pa
Wind speed2.40 m/s
Cloud cover64.2 %
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 1 detection point · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
WikipediaWikimedia Foundation4 languages↗
BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗
GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility2 058 records↗
ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI2 eDNA detections↗
BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗
NCBIUS National Library of Medicinesequences↗
Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗
GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗