Cis pośredni – gatunek pochodzenia mieszańcowego należący do rodziny cisowatych. Jest to mieszaniec cisu japońskiego i pospolitego otrzymany w Hunnewell Pinetum w Stanach Zjednoczonych około 1900 r. W uprawie rozpowszechnione są odmiany, często rozmnażane i sadzone także w Polsce. Do taksonu nie należą rośliny będące jednym klonem, lecz mieszańce w różnym stopniu zbliżone do taksonów rodzicielskich z powodu krzyżowania wstecznego.
No narrative description available for this taxon yet.
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Taxus media has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
eDNA detections7
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 270 records
Wild obs. + sensor1 454
Museum / vouchered763
Cultivated / captive25
Other28
Origin
Introduced17
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO4 208 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy97% within 1 km
≤100 m 1 179≤1 km 120≤10 km 43>10 km 1
1 343 georeferenced · 111 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor1 454
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km
≤100 m 497≤1 km 41≤10 km 20
558 georeferenced · 205 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence763
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
Coordinate accuracy6% within 1 km
≤1 km 1≤10 km 17
18 georeferenced · 7 without coordinates
Open the mapnot free-living25
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions17 of 32 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
DBF-NHMDlocation not on record
219
SLU Artdatabankenlocation not on record
178
LDlocation not on record
77
Provincia di Livornolocation not on record
49
Salzburg, AT
45
Olocation not on record
38
Bronx, US
15
Oskarshamn, SE
15
Richmond, US
11
University of Silesia in Katowicelocation not on record
7
Denver, US
6
Corvallis, US
4
Saint Louis, US
3
Durham, US
3
Chongqing Museumlocation not on record
3
GJOlocation not on record
2
IFR-DNFlocation not on record
2
DOI/NPS, Mississippi National River & Recreation Arealocation not on record
2
Stockholm, SE
2
Bangkok, TH
2
Trondheim, NO
2
Wuzhou, CN
1
Florida Museum of Natural History- Zoology, Paleontology & Paleobotanylocation not on record
1
US
1
Tampere, FI
1
College of the Atlantic, Museumlocation not on record
1
Québec, CA
1
MeiseBGlocation not on record
1
Bothell, US
1
FLASlocation not on record
1
Lincoln, US
1
KMNlocation not on record
1
32 institutions · 696 of 763 vouchered records shown · 67 without an institution code
Cultivated / Captivenot free-living
A living individual in a botanical garden, zoo or nursery — cultivated or kept, not free-living.
09Environmental DNA7 detections
Where the DNA of Taxus media was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found7
Studies independent surveys1
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 7 detections have coordinates
Open the map0 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.
