Compounds documented for Tabernaemontana alba across natural-product and food-composition databases — not just the ~150 nutrients on a classic label ("nutritional dark matter").
Compound class profile5 classes
Iboga type13
Aspidosperma type $ Corynanthe type2
Aspidosperma type1
Aspidosperma type $ Corynanthe type $ Strychnos type1
A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Tabernaemontana alba has left across the world's sequence archives.
At a glance
DNA specimens12
Marker genes3
GenBank sequences9
eDNA detections6
Countries2
The DNA barcodea real sequence read deposited for this species
Tabernaemontana alba voucher Pedro Acevedo 16056 (MEXU, US) ribulose-1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase large subunit (rbcL) gene, partial cds; chloroplast
Marker genes sequenced
★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.
★matK6★rbcL3★rbcLa
plant barcode
08Occurrence & distribution
Record type2 626 records
Wild obs. + sensor262
Museum / vouchered2 362
Other2
Range
Area of Occupancy AOO5 008 km²
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
Coordinate accuracy84% within 1 km
≤100 m 98≤1 km 65≤10 km 27>10 km 3
193 georeferenced · 69 without coordinates
Open the mapobservation + sensor262
Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence
Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.
Coordinate accuracy96% within 1 km
≤100 m 844≤1 km 23≤10 km 36>10 km 4
907 georeferenced · 1 455 without coordinates
Open the institutions mapphysical evidence2 362
Wildobservation + sensor
Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.
10Collections & institutions
Holding institutions40 of 71 geolocated
Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.
Institution
Specimens
Durango, MX
576
Saint Louis, US
428
Mexico City, MX
273
Chicago, US
200
National Biodiversity Institute, Costa Ricalocation not on record
111
Austin, US
95
Bronx, US
65
Mexico City, MX
50
Mexico City, MX
45
Tampa, US
29
Tapachula, MX
27
Mérida, MX
24
San Francisco de Campeche, MX
23
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabascolocation not on record
22
León, NI
21
University of Stellenboschlocation not on record
18
Juriquilla, MX
15
Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas, Universidad Veracruzana, Región Xalapalocation not on record
13
Madison, US
12
Chapingo, MX
11
Guatemala, GT
11
Austin, US
11
San Francisco, US
10
San José, CR
10
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
10
MEXUlocation not on record
9
Edinburgh, GB
9
San Jose State University, Museum of Birds and Mammalslocation not on record
9
Kew, GB
9
Museo Nacional de Costa Rica (MNCR)location not on record
8
Ann Arbor, US
6
Area de Conservacion Guanacastelocation not on record
6
Tuxtla Gutiérrez, MX
5
Montréal, CA
4
Guatemala City, GT
4
Fort Worth, US
4
Sociedad para el Estudio de los Recursos Bióticos de Oaxaca, A. C.location not on record
3
Davis, US
3
Cambridge, US
2
Mérida, MX
2
CASlocation not on record
2
CJBGlocation not on record
2
MAlocation not on record
2
Mexico City, MX
2
Managua, NI
2
Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Instituto de Biologialocation not on record
2
Philadelphia, US
2
UNICAMPlocation not on record
2
MeiseBGlocation not on record
2
Embrapa Agrobiology Diazothrophic Microbial Culture Collectionlocation not on record
1
San Diego, US
1
OTSlocation not on record
1
HUAlocation not on record
1
Sangmiung Universitylocation not on record
1
SCZlocation not on record
1
Jena Microbial Resource Collectionlocation not on record
1
Toluca, MX
1
HEMlocation not on record
1
Universidad Nacional de Colombia (UNAL)location not on record
1
Institut de Biologia Evolutiva, (CSIC-UPF)location not on record
1
Universidad de Antioquia (UdeA)location not on record
1
Provincial Museum of Albertalocation not on record
1
Jardín Botánico de Cartagena "Guillermo Piñeres" (JBC)location not on record
1
Claremont, US
1
BMlocation not on record
1
Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (INPA)location not on record
1
South Kensington, GB
1
ASUlocation not on record
1
Centro Cultural Santo Domingolocation not on record
1
Wuzhou, CN
1
Riverside, US
1
71 institutions · 2 233 of 2 362 vouchered records shown · 128 without an institution code
09Environmental DNA6 detections
Where the DNA of Tabernaemontana alba was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.
Signal
Detections DNA found6
Studies independent surveys1
Countries2
Signal confidence: weakweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections
Where its DNA was found
0 of 6 detections have coordinates
Open the map2 countries0
How strong is each trace?
DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.
Modelled climatemodelled
−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C
Temperature median25.8 °C 17.0–26.4
Seasonal swing summer↔winter3.60 °C
Max temp (day)28.6 °C 21.4–28.7
Min temp (night)23.4 °C 12.6–24.6
Precipitation20.0 mm/mo 5.40–132
Air humidity59.7 % 55.3–68.4
Moisture balance-139 mm/mo
Vapour deficit1,280 Pa 746–1,334
Wind speed5.10 m/s
Cloud cover17.7 % 13.3–32.4
CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 6 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche
How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.