Suillus glandulosipes

Thiers & A.H.Sm. · species

image placeholder — illustration coming later

Fungi/Basidiomycota/Agaricomycetes/Boletales/Suillaceae/Suillus

At a glance

Occurrence records52

Data sources7

Biological traits0

DNA specimens3

eDNA detections4

Sources7 archives

Databases and archives Suillus glandulosipes's data was compiled from.

WikipediaWikimedia Foundation2 languages↗

BioWikiNetmultilingual Wikipediamultilingual↗

GBIFGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility52 records↗

ENAEuropean Nucleotide Archive · EMBL-EBI4 eDNA detections↗

BOLD SystemsCentre for Biodiversity Genomics3 specimens↗

Open Tree of LifeOpenTreephylogeny backbone↗

GLoBIGlobal Biotic Interactionsbiotic interactions↗

On this page4 sections

Every layer below draws on the sources above — open one to explore it, or use ← → to move between tabs.

NarrativeWikipediaarticle

Occurrence & distributionGBIF52 records

Environmental DNA2 datasets · 2 countries4 detections

DNA & barcodingBOLD3 specimens

01Narrative

Suillus glandulosipes is a species of edible mushroom in the genus Suillus. It was first described scientifically by American mycologists Harry D. Thiers and Alexander H. Smith in 1964.

No narrative description available for this taxon yet.

02Traits & measurements

No structured trait data for this taxon yet.

05DNA & barcoding3 specimens

A DNA barcode is a short, standardised stretch of genes that works like a fingerprint — enough to tell one species from another. Below is the molecular trace Suillus glandulosipes has left across the world's sequence archives.

At a glance

DNA specimens3

Marker genes2

eDNA detections4

Countries2

Marker genes sequenced

★ the standard DNA barcode for this group — the short region actually read to tell this species apart. The rest are extra genes sequenced along the way.

★ITS★ITS1

fungal barcode

08Occurrence & distribution

Record type52 records

Wild obs. + sensor24

Museum / vouchered28

Range

Area of Occupancy AOO148 km²

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

Coordinate accuracy50% within 1 km

≤100 m 5≤1 km 6≤10 km 8>10 km 3

22 georeferenced · 2 without coordinates

Open the mapobservation + sensor24

Museum / Voucheredphysical evidence

Backed by a physical specimen — a herbarium sheet, sample or voucher held in a collection. “Vouchered” means supported by material evidence, not just an observation.

Coordinate accuracy73% within 1 km

≤100 m 1≤1 km 7≤10 km 2>10 km 1

11 georeferenced · 17 without coordinates

Open the institutions mapphysical evidence28

Wildobservation + sensor

Human sightings and records, or camera-trap / sensor detections — someone (or a device) saw or captured the species in the wild.

10Collections & institutions

Holding institutions8 of 13 geolocated

Institutions and collections holding physical, vouchered specimens of this species — click a row to fly to it on the map.

Institution	Specimens
Bronx, US	4
Durham, US	4
WTUlocation not on record	2
Ann Arbor, US	2
TENN-Flocation not on record	2
Catholic University of Pekinglocation not on record	2
Ixtacuixtla de Mariano Matamoros, MX	1
Rene Pomerleau Herbariumlocation not on record	1
Vancouver, CA	1
Denver, US	1
Personal Herbarium of Paula DeSantolocation not on record	1
St. Paul, US	1
Toronto, CA	1

13 institutions · 23 of 28 vouchered records shown · 5 without an institution code

09Environmental DNA4 detections

Where the DNA of Suillus glandulosipes was picked up in samples of water, soil or air — nobody saw the organism, only its DNA left behind. A trace is a clue that the species was near, not a confirmed sighting.

Signal

Detections DNA found4

Studies independent surveys2

Countries2

Verifiable raw sequence linked1

Signal confidence: moderateweighed across independent studies, places & mapped detections

Where its DNA was found

0 of 4 detections have coordinates

Open the map2 countries0

How strong is each trace?

DNA read depthRead counts were not reported for this species — the map shows presence only, not how strong each trace was.

Modelled climatemodelled

−15°Ctemperature across detection sites+40°C

Temperature median11.3 °C 9.70–12.9

Seasonal swing summer↔winter31.7 °C

Max temp (day)16.0 °C 14.4–17.6

Min temp (night)7.70 °C 6.40–8.90

Precipitation121 mm/mo 111–132

Air humidity61.8 % 61.7–61.9

Moisture balance45.4 mm/mo 21.7–69.1

Vapour deficit517 Pa 461–572

Wind speed3.50 m/s 3.20–3.80

Cloud cover53.5 % 50.2–56.7

CHELSA 1981–2010, ~9 km grid, at location & month of 2 detection points · median with p10–p90 · reflects where sampling happened, not only the true niche

How to read this: each dot is one detection of this species' DNA in an environmental sample. The confidence meter weighs how many independent studies and places back up the signal — one detection in one study is a hint; many across several studies is solid. Records dated before 2008 (when eDNA methods began) are treated as likely mislabeled and left off the map.

←→tabs

The Life Data · species page · narrative wired to read_model image placeholder · 3D tilt requires an http server (WebGL)